Divisive though he may be, I can't say I agree more with Simon Jordan on this one:
https://talksport.com/football/1415001/manchester-city-erling-haaland-harry-kane-transfer/
Without Kane, who I rate as the best striker in the league, Spurs would be about 12th in the table.
Without Haaland, who is clearly a great poacher, City would still win the title regardless. Just look at last year and the year before.
Does anyone genuinely think Haaland would've scored more for Spurs than what Kane has done this season? Not to mention his assists and overall team contribution.
You have to give it to Kane, he's in a really poor side and yet he delivers for them week after week. It's not just goals either; the way he drops back like a veteran number 10 and creates chances for his teammates is ridiculous.
Far better than Haaland I would say.
Simon Jordan On Haaland
posted on 14/5/23
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/23
banned again
posted on 15/5/23
Nope
posted on 18/5/23
Another big game bottle job from Haaland last night. A performance would make even Heskey look clinical in front of goal.
posted on 18/5/23
#PrayForCuler
posted on 18/5/23
Rashford is better than Haaland as an all-round forward.
posted on 18/5/23
How many hours of computer access do this care homes allow for these days ffs!!!
posted on 18/5/23
comment by Cinciwolf----Old Trafford record attendance.....WOLVES V GRIMSBY. .......lolz (U11551)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
How many hours of computer access do this care homes allow for these days ffs!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many hours did they allow when you were there? Maybe things have changed since then.
posted on 18/5/23
Both Haaland and Rashford up for POTY.
The experts can decide.
posted on 18/5/23
Rashford