or to join or start a new Discussion

196 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

115 plus charges…

…does anyone know exactly what ALL the charges actually are?

posted on 21/5/23

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 5 minutes ago
If City are eventually found guilty of even 1 of the 115 charges, then they are cheats
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you really think that then every team in the league is a cheat for one reason or another.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the question is, can you name one single breach that each team is guilty of? I'm sure Ripley will back me here
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of PL rules? Yes, it happens to a few several times a season, player or manager conduct normally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I expected better from you…..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All depends what you consider “cheating”. Most of those I wouldn’t either, nor would I consider at least half of our charges either though. I would consider what your club did as cheating though

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume you’re referring to the hacking stuff? I found all that quite funny tbh! I read that we recruited one of your people and he used his own password to log onto City’s scouting system? Obviously naughty from us, but equally shoddy cyber security from City. They should have disabled his access the second he left!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That and all the PEDs

posted on 21/5/23

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 5 minutes ago
If City are eventually found guilty of even 1 of the 115 charges, then they are cheats
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you really think that then every team in the league is a cheat for one reason or another.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the question is, can you name one single breach that each team is guilty of? I'm sure Ripley will back me here
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of PL rules? Yes, it happens to a few several times a season, player or manager conduct normally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I expected better from you…..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All depends what you consider “cheating”. Most of those I wouldn’t either, nor would I consider at least half of our charges either though. I would consider what your club did as cheating though

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume you’re referring to the hacking stuff? I found all that quite funny tbh! I read that we recruited one of your people and he used his own password to log onto City’s scouting system? Obviously naughty from us, but equally shoddy cyber security from City. They should have disabled his access the second he left!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Completely agree!

posted on 22/5/23

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-charges-premier-league-26166658?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target

posted on 22/5/23

comment by Harambe (U22339)
posted 6 hours, 6 minutes ago
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-charges-premier-league-26166658?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As we can see, the OP could have done a 30 second Google search, instead he stuck his fingers in his ears and posted here on 606 instead

posted on 22/5/23

So if walk past a house and the front door is open, I’m quite at liberty to enter and steal a few items on the basis that it’s the homeowner’s fault for not locking said door?

I’m glad we’ve sorted that one out

posted on 22/5/23

comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Harambe (U22339)
posted 6 hours, 6 minutes ago
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-charges-premier-league-26166658?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As we can see, the OP could have done a 30 second Google search, instead he stuck his fingers in his ears and posted here on 606 instead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The OP never stated that he didn’t know what the charges are, he asked if others knew.

posted on 22/5/23

The subject of third party companies has been discussed for weeks on here

posted on 22/5/23

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Harambe (U22339)
posted 6 hours, 6 minutes ago
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-charges-premier-league-26166658?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As we can see, the OP could have done a 30 second Google search, instead he stuck his fingers in his ears and posted here on 606 instead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The OP never stated that he didn’t know what the charges are, he asked if others knew.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose. I guess he's now got bored of this thread. It was a good thread though. 200 comments in quick time

posted on 22/5/23

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 40 minutes ago
So if walk past a house and the front door is open, I’m quite at liberty to enter and steal a few items on the basis that it’s the homeowner’s fault for not locking said door?

I’m glad we’ve sorted that one out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, it's disappointing when people try to find justifications for bending the rules

posted on 22/5/23

comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 40 minutes ago
So if walk past a house and the front door is open, I’m quite at liberty to enter and steal a few items on the basis that it’s the homeowner’s fault for not locking said door?

I’m glad we’ve sorted that one out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, it's disappointing when people try to find justifications for bending the rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available