De Gea, Eriksen, Martial

comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 5 minutes ago
De Gea new contract makes no sense.

So much money he’s on and he’s let the team down too often. Surely could be replaced by a steady keeper on less than 1/3 his salary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt that

What I love about this potential signing is that there is no way rival fans can corrupt or generally make fun of his surname:

https://twitter.com/centredevils/status/1666496080262090752?t=h0T3OI42KMG2oiQXoYpwig&s=19

I actually thought Eriksen was pretty good in CM with Bruno and Casemiro BEFORE casemiros ban and his injury.

I feel like he was rushed back due to Sabitzer injury and he didn’t look right at the end of the season.

I’ll reserve judgement till I see him next year, he was a free after all

Eriksen should be starting about 20 games, not 40+

If he can provide 20 or so starts where he can play the full 90, it’s a no brainier to keep him

I'm not sure Eriksen is able to play the full 90 minutes of a game now.

Obviously if we manage his minutes better he'd be more likely to last a full game but even during the first half of the season he looked spent after about an hour.

I don't think he should be playing against the top sides, certainly the best sides out of possession.

comment by The Red Side™ (U11275)
posted 39 seconds ago
I'm not sure Eriksen is able to play the full 90 minutes of a game now.

Obviously if we manage his minutes better he'd be more likely to last a full game but even during the first half of the season he looked spent after about an hour.

I don't think he should be playing against the top sides, certainly the best sides out of possession.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A bit a like Scholes. He can still be a valuable squad member though, as you say.

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin (U2958)
posted 19 minutes ago
Eriksen should be starting about 20 games, not 40+

If he can provide 20 or so starts where he can play the full 90, it’s a no brainier to keep him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn’t ever saying we shouldn’t keep him, I meant he shouldn’t be 1st choice.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Red Side™ (U11275)
posted 39 seconds ago
I'm not sure Eriksen is able to play the full 90 minutes of a game now.

Obviously if we manage his minutes better he'd be more likely to last a full game but even during the first half of the season he looked spent after about an hour.

I don't think he should be playing against the top sides, certainly the best sides out of possession.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A bit a like Scholes. He can still be a valuable squad member though, as you say.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah he'd still be useful, especially if we start taking better care in possession.

Eriksen is decent if the other team is parking the bus and we have a lot of the ball.
If we are chasing shadows then the man is a ghost.

comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 9 hours, 10 minutes ago
Eriksen is decent if the other team is parking the bus and we have a lot of the ball.
If we are chasing shadows then the man is a ghost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. Of the three, he's the one that I think would still be useful in certain circumstances, where we're facing a team who are sitting in. Even his set piece delivery alone can be useful in said circumstances.

The other two? Well, I don't think they should be at the club but that has been the case for some time and yet here we are, with De Gea about to sign a new deal