So I saw this hit the news earlier but it was mainly on random sites but now it’s now on mainstream US media and I see the BBC just reported it:
According to a demand letter that was sent by the women’s lawyer, Ariel Mitchell, the woman was separated from her friend by NBA and Heat security and forced into a restroom where McGregor and his security guard were waiting, per multiple outlets that have obtained the letter.
The woman got away from McGregor by telling him that she had to urinate, but then the retired fighter forced her to perform oral s*x on him. The letter says McGregor then grabbed the woman, pinned her against the wall and attempted to rape her, according to multiple reports.
I cannot believe this to be true because if it is…we have security guards kidnapping and then forcing into toilets to be attacked
The McGregor Situation
posted on 16/6/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 0 seconds ago
On one part I find it hard to believe a guy as rich and we'll known as he is needs to force himself onto women, especially when he has paid off strippers he's impregnated already. In this day and age I'm sure there's plenty of clout chasing stupid women who would love to 5hag him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have another one!
Rape isn't about not being able to get laid. It is about power.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you read my whole post? Bit stupid to chop a bit out to suit your weird agenda. I don't condone rape at all.
Strange coming from a guy who is named after a bloke that 5hagged and married a kid 😂
This place cracks me up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. I didn't say you condoned rape. I questioned your understanding of why men carry out such attacks.
2. I am named after Elvis Hammond.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry I apologise. Trouble with reading stuff online. Reader determines the tone. I did think you was being unnecessarily judgemental but totally take it back.
I'll be the first to apologise when it's justified and youve shown I got the wrong end of the stick.
posted on 16/6/23
Just to add further fuel to the fire:
TMZ have now released the video footage that her attorney reference in her letter, which appears contrary to several points raised in the alleged victim’s account as documented in that letter, further diluting the credibility of her account.
posted on 17/6/23
comment by rooney_hernandez (U7012)
posted 8 hours, 19 minutes ago
Just to add further fuel to the fire:
TMZ have now released the video footage that her attorney reference in her letter, which appears contrary to several points raised in the alleged victim’s account as documented in that letter, further diluting the credibility of her account.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which several points is the video contrary to?
posted on 17/6/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
comment by rooney_hernandez (U7012)
posted 8 hours, 19 minutes ago
Just to add further fuel to the fire:
TMZ have now released the video footage that her attorney reference in her letter, which appears contrary to several points raised in the alleged victim’s account as documented in that letter, further diluting the credibility of her account.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which several points is the video contrary to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
comment by rooney_hernandez (U7012)
posted 8 hours, 19 minutes ago
Just to add further fuel to the fire:
TMZ have now released the video footage that her attorney reference in her letter, which appears contrary to several points raised in the alleged victim’s account as documented in that letter, further diluting the credibility of her account.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which several points is the video contrary to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The account claims that the accuser was physically forced into the bathroom by security; this didn’t happen and she in fact appears to enter willingly/cordially, without any security intervention.
The account claims that McGregor was already in the bathroom and appeared from within a stall; this didn’t happen, as he is outside the bathroom, whispers something to her (probably along the lines of “join me in the bathroom&rdquo, and they both enter the bathroom together.
The account claims that security coercively separated her from her friend, this didn’t happen and the friend walks to the bathroom with them, again in a cordial manner.
The account claims that security would not let her friend enter the bathroom, this didn’t happen (at least, from the snippet that the video shows).
The account implies (though, in fairness, does not explicitly state) that this was their first interaction, at least of that evening. Video footage has emerged that shows the two partying together earlier in the evening.
Again, all of these things do not discount the possibility of rape - you could very much enter a bathroom willingly and still fall victim to sexual assault - however, it does somewhat alleviate (or at least place doubt upon) the credibility of the account, given several direct contradictions.
That’s what McGregor’s lawyers would argue, anyway, and in the absence of physical evidence (which is an assumption on my part), it becomes much harder to land your point in a ‘he said, she said’ battle.
Upon emergence of the video footage, McGregor’s lawyers have said that Mitchell - the accuser’s attorney - has “changed her story”, but we don’t know what that means as yet (or at least I can’t find anything other than assumption and/or implication)
posted on 17/6/23
Perhaps the video I've seen isn't the same as the one you're referring to. How many are there? From what I've seen, the above comment is pure bolloxx. I'll try to see if I missed something.
Might you have a link? Where did you watch the video?
posted on 17/6/23
I’ve seen the same one reported by various media outlets, which seems to originate from TMZ:
https://amp.tmz.com/2023/06/16/video-bathroom-interaction-conor-mcgregor-alleged-rape-victim/
Then the footage of them partying earlier in the night is apparently taken by the accuser and posted on her social media.
Apparently the “changing her story” bit re Mitchell is referencing the fact that Mitchell now claims that the accuser believed she was being taken to the Four Seasons, after McGregor had invited her to his room earlier in the evening.
posted on 17/6/23
That video seems to cut off for me - I don’t know if it’s the same for you - but this link includes the video in full:
https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2023/06/conor-mcgregor-sexual-assault-bathroom-video-nba-finals-miami
posted on 17/6/23
It wouldn’t surprise me if he did, he’s a narcissistic gobshite who thinks he can get whatever he wants, saying that, that video isn’t enough to convince me he did what he’s accused of.
posted on 17/6/23
Bit where she claimed security forced her in the toilets, at a huge public venue, is the bit I was 🤔geared up mcgregor with his ego I wouldn't put anything past him but the idea a security team would take part just stank of bs. Especially noting the time and location.
They need to really punish her if it's just a money grab to set a precedent as it just undermines genuine rape claims tbh.
posted on 17/6/23
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 4 hours, 40 minutes ago
Bit where she claimed security forced her in the toilets, at a huge public venue, is the bit I was 🤔geared up mcgregor with his ego I wouldn't put anything past him but the idea a security team would take part just stank of bs. Especially noting the time and location.
They need to really punish her if it's just a money grab to set a precedent as it just undermines genuine rape claims tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watched the full video. Agree with this but it seems like security was protecting the entrance to the bathroom. Was she forced into the bathroom though? Perhaps using verbal threats? Why isn't there more video? The place must be full of cameras.
Her lawyer is greedy and stupid for deciding to immediately declare they just want money. There was no need for that, people don't need to know that right now and the lawyer facked up. Stoopid move.