I was thinking team A should take all five penalties first, posting a score, with team B then attempting to beat it. Maybe the team with most shots on target chooses to go first or second.
Then I thought, what if we lined up 5 balls across the imaginary 12 yard line and had 5 takers all take a penalty at once?
Seemingly, it would require much more practice in training for 5 people to all simultaneously kick a ball at goal without ricocheting with other balls or hitting the keeper. Spotlight wouldn’t be on one taker either, reducing pressure on these fragile footballers.
Any other ideas to make penalties better?
New idea for penalty shootouts.
posted on 28/6/23
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 2 hours, 51 minutes ago
At all major tournaments, give England eight spot kicks to their opponents' five. Just to make it even funnier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 28/6/23
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by newWAYNEorder (U23010)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
The only thing I would change is alternate who takes the next penalty first, so if everyone is successful, each team is feeling the pressure of having to score to stay in it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ABBA system, has been touted over the last few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamma Mia!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ugh, here we go again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to b
posted on 28/6/23
Ook any offenders
posted on 28/6/23
I've always been an advocate for multi-ball extra time.
You can get creative with different variations of multi-ball, and only inform the teams at kick-off what the rules will be. E.g. "today we're playing with three balls" or "we're starting with 11 balls; whenever a goal is scored, that ball is 'retired' and the game doesn't end until all the balls have been scored; off you go... oh, I forgot to say that each successive goal scored is valued as double the previous one."
posted on 28/6/23
comment by Shaun M - Livin da vi la Roca (U9955)
posted 4 hours, 38 minutes ago
The only thing about penalties that needs looking at it is the blatant gamesmanship from the keepers. No need for the unsporting conduct. Saw it in pretty much every shootout in this seasons playoffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least the World Cup was free of such skullduggery.
posted on 28/6/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
I've always been an advocate for multi-ball extra time.
You can get creative with different variations of multi-ball, and only inform the teams at kick-off what the rules will be. E.g. "today we're playing with three balls" or "we're starting with 11 balls; whenever a goal is scored, that ball is 'retired' and the game doesn't end until all the balls have been scored; off you go... oh, I forgot to say that each successive goal scored is valued as double the previous one."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think id be absolutely insane by the end of the game.
posted on 29/6/23
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 21 hours, 55 minutes ago
The only thing I would change is alternate who takes the next penalty first, so if everyone is successful, each team is feeling the pressure of having to score to stay in it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did this a few years back. First team went, then the second team took two, then the first team took two.. I can't remember which league/competition but it obviously wasn't popular.
posted on 29/6/23
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_shoot-out_(association_football)#Advantage_to_team_kicking_first?
posted on 29/6/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 17 hours, 24 minutes ago
I've always been an advocate for multi-ball extra time.
You can get creative with different variations of multi-ball, and only inform the teams at kick-off what the rules will be. E.g. "today we're playing with three balls" or "we're starting with 11 balls; whenever a goal is scored, that ball is 'retired' and the game doesn't end until all the balls have been scored; off you go... oh, I forgot to say that each successive goal scored is valued as double the previous one."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if there's 11 balls you can score the first 7 or 8 balls but still lose because the opponent scored the final 2 or 3?
posted on 29/6/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 17 hours, 24 minutes ago
I've always been an advocate for multi-ball extra time.
You can get creative with different variations of multi-ball, and only inform the teams at kick-off what the rules will be. E.g. "today we're playing with three balls" or "we're starting with 11 balls; whenever a goal is scored, that ball is 'retired' and the game doesn't end until all the balls have been scored; off you go... oh, I forgot to say that each successive goal scored is valued as double the previous one."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if there's 11 balls you can score the first 7 or 8 balls but still lose because the opponent scored the final 2 or 3?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a joke. You always win by scoring the last ball, as it's always worth more than all the rest put together.
G/PT*
1
2 (1)
4 (3)
8 (7)
16 (15)
32 (31)
64 (63)
etc.
*V= Value of goal
PT=Previous total