The guy left the club in April. He’s gone to Celtic. We’ve been through a caretaker manager, an interim manager and now have a new manager since then. 7 players have left. The ones truly responsible for this mess are well and truly still in post and attempting to put the fires out they started.
So why are we still talking about Brendan Rodgers? The backroom staff that left yesterday weren’t even even his. And we’re still talking about Rodgers, like he’s manipulating everything behind the scenes while holding his Leicester voodoo doll.
It’s gone, it’s over, there’s nothing of him left at the club anymore. Whether you think he was responsible for our relegation or not - he’s not here. So why are we still talking about him? Well I say ‘we’…….
Browse:
Why are we still talking about Rodgers?
posted on 1/7/23
He does seem to leave a trail of despair and destruction wherever he goes
comment by Dave The Jackal (U22179)
posted on 1/7/23
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 3 minutes ago
He does seem to leave a trail of despair and destruction wherever he goes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t remind me, Schiz … I’m still trying to come to terms with the return of the snakey coont!
posted on 1/7/23
comment by Dave The Jackal (U22179)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 3 minutes ago
He does seem to leave a trail of despair and destruction wherever he goes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t remind me, Schiz … I’m still trying to come to terms with the return of the snakey coont!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did mean to add "fingers crossed" for his new adventure
posted on 1/7/23
The problem with Rodgers is if he’s allowed to stay in post well past his sell by date then it becomes damaging. Liverpool got shot of him as he was starting to unravel, it would have happened at Celtic if he left and Leicester were stupid enough to keep him for 18 months too long.
These are all club decisions though - the man can only damage a club in the long term if he’s allowed to. We allowed him to.
comment by Nuneaton_fox (U7936)
posted on 1/7/23
I'm only talking about Brendan bcos TB can't let him go. Methinks dost protest too much. Is he secretly is lurv with Rodgers?
I mention Rudders frequently bcos his decisions still have a significant impact on the club. We will only b able to see wot damage he is causing as the season unfolds.
posted on 2/7/23
Yeah the difference there is - Rudkin is still at the club so absolutely sensible to keep talking about him
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available