Premier league sack race

comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 57 seconds ago
I obviously need to spell this out then. Pay attention and read this carefully stupid.

Since Klopp came to Liverpool how much have they spent, both NET & Gross, and what have they won as a return on that spend?

Comparatively what have United spent, by both metrics, and what have they won?

We know that United have spent far more and won far less. Simple enough for most you’d think. Try and give a fair answer to the above and we may get somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve got you knickers all twisted again, why are you comparing with United?
No one has claimed United are performing miracles, read back through the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you comparing LFC under Klopp to Ferguson who left a decade ago and Guardiola who is the manager of a rival?

You’re struggling with the simple idea that we would compare our progress, spend and success with our contemporary rivals whilst you’re comparing it to a manager who left your club a decade ago. It’s my with me undercrackers in a twist though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I used those two managers solely to show what “$hite loads” of trophies is
I’d have thought that was obvious, even to you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since Klopp joined LFC:

How much have United spent and what they won?

How much have LFC spent and what they won?

Go on have a crack at answering it without your history books
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs, go and have a lie down, you’re arguing something completely different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So despite spending significantly less than United & others like City, Chelsea et al, we have won every trophy available, except the Europa. You wouldn’t class that as shiite loads?

Meanwhile United have spent far more, both net and gross, got through 3 (or 4) managers and have a league cup and Europa to show for it.

You know if the tables were turned you’d call or something similar to miraculous or whatever. In fact we wouldn’t hear the end of it.

Yeah you’ve completely lost it now

comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 41 seconds ago
Yeah you’ve completely lost it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the lad seeing hisarse over an adjective FFS

We’ve won four trophies in the same time. It’s not shiiiite loads.

comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
We’ve won four trophies in the same time. It’s not shiiiite loads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’re happy with the league cup, FA cup, Europa and super cup cool. I’ll raise you a PL, CL, FA, League, Super and CWC and being a final away from the clean sweep of Europa as well and call it shiite loads

One trophy away from winning the lot under Klopp isn’t shiite loads apparently

Never said I was happy. Just pointing out that winning four trophies isn’t shiiiiite loads, which was your claim.

comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Never said I was happy. Just pointing out that winning four trophies isn’t shiiiiite loads, which was your claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never claimed 4 trophies is shiite loads. If you’re including the super cup in United’s total then it also counts in ours no?

Why would I include the super cup when we didn’t win it?

100