Where do we go from here then?

Chelsea have stitched us up like a pair of kippers. Signing both strengthens them immensely and weakens us considerably.

We have to get a DM in now.

comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 27 seconds ago
Chelsea have stitched us up like a pair of kippers. Signing both strengthens them immensely and weakens us considerably.

We have to get a DM in now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They haven't signed either.

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 27 seconds ago
Chelsea have stitched us up like a pair of kippers. Signing both strengthens them immensely and weakens us considerably.

We have to get a DM in now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They haven't signed either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've made more progress than we have

Old age h-f, thanks for the correction.

It's interesting that they've agreed a deal with Lavia but still no bid for Caicedo. Sounds like they may be struggling.

It's telling that despite Chelsea having a disaster of a season last year, they are still seen as a more attractive proposition to players.

Is that because they've got more ambitious owners who stick two fingers up at FFP and expose it as the disaster that it is?

comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 16 minutes ago
It's telling that despite Chelsea having a disaster of a season last year, they are still seen as a more attractive proposition to players.

Is that because they've got more ambitious owners who stick two fingers up at FFP and expose it as the disaster that it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Money talks. After last season’s £600M+ purchases they seem to have more money than sense.

City got away with ffp...so cfc probably think so can we

comment by JimmyTheRed (U1682)
posted 6 hours, 54 minutes ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 16 minutes ago
It's telling that despite Chelsea having a disaster of a season last year, they are still seen as a more attractive proposition to players.

Is that because they've got more ambitious owners who stick two fingers up at FFP and expose it as the disaster that it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Money talks. After last season’s £600M+ purchases they seem to have more money than sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your average wage per player is higher than ours

Myths are easier to live with though I guess

comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 5 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by JimmyTheRed (U1682)
posted 6 hours, 54 minutes ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 16 minutes ago
It's telling that despite Chelsea having a disaster of a season last year, they are still seen as a more attractive proposition to players.

Is that because they've got more ambitious owners who stick two fingers up at FFP and expose it as the disaster that it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Money talks. After last season’s £600M+ purchases they seem to have more money than sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your average wage per player is higher than ours

Myths are easier to live with though I guess
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven't broken any FFP rules though. Plenty of brown envelopes been hitting offshore accounts at Chelsea. Another disgraceful football club.