or to join or start a new Discussion

11 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

Veliz

New quotes from Ange basically saying Veliz is a very exciting player for the future, but probably won’t see much game time at the beginning. A strike force consisting of Richarlison, Son, Kulu, Solomon and Scarlett just isn’t enough. They simply have to bring in a forward be it this highly rated striker from Gent we have been linked to or another striker who can come in and play straight away. Would be livid if Levy does nothing now after selling Harry.

posted on 11/8/23

Ange said they have been planning for Kane leaving for some time, so you would assume Veliz is the replacement.

I bet we don`t spend much more, the Kane money has already been spent and they won`t be throwing much more cash around.

Levy out.

posted on 12/8/23

As soon as I saw he signed a six year contract I thought he might be loaned out. Sarr signed for the same length.

But Kane leaving might means he stays. Hope he stays and impresses Ange or gets loaned out in Jan.

posted on 12/8/23

Richarlison will be the main number 9. If he fails, that will give Veliz a chance.

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 12/8/23

Depressing to think Richarlison will be the one we're going to try and replace Kane with this season. I can't seriously believe they bought him with that in mind though. He is nowhere near the quality of Kane and never was but we might have to accept that we'll be relying on him this season because Levy will be desperately hoping we can get by without a true attempt at a Kane replacement.

Who knows with Veliz but I guess somewhat encouraging to hear Ange talk about him like that.

posted on 12/8/23

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/8/23

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/8/23

comment by Tarrico_sees_red (U5595)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
Depressing to think Richarlison will be the one we're going to try and replace Kane with this season. I can't seriously believe they bought him with that in mind though. He is nowhere near the quality of Kane and never was but we might have to accept that we'll be relying on him this season because Levy will be desperately hoping we can get by without a true attempt at a Kane replacement.

Who knows with Veliz but I guess somewhat encouraging to hear Ange talk about him like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I always saw Richy as Kane’s replacement - hence the £60mil. Such a bad buy - another Conte legacy? Or didn’t he want him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Richarlison, given a proper run will score plenty. Bit premature to write him off before a ball has been kicked.

I am sure another striker has also been lined up as well.

posted on 12/8/23

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 12/8/23

comment by Tarrico_sees_red (U5595)
posted 2 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
Depressing to think Richarlison will be the one we're going to try and replace Kane with this season. I can't seriously believe they bought him with that in mind though. He is nowhere near the quality of Kane and never was but we might have to accept that we'll be relying on him this season because Levy will be desperately hoping we can get by without a true attempt at a Kane replacement.

Who knows with Veliz but I guess somewhat encouraging to hear Ange talk about him like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I always saw Richy as Kane’s replacement - hence the £60mil. Such a bad buy - another Conte legacy? Or didn’t he want him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think we should read too much into that price paid. We just had our hands burnt on a player we thought would add quality to the squad. If anyone at the club thought Richy was a legit Kane replacement they need to not be working at the club anymore.

posted on 12/8/23

comment by Tarrico_sees_red (U5595)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Tarrico_sees_red (U5595)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
Depressing to think Richarlison will be the one we're going to try and replace Kane with this season. I can't seriously believe they bought him with that in mind though. He is nowhere near the quality of Kane and never was but we might have to accept that we'll be relying on him this season because Levy will be desperately hoping we can get by without a true attempt at a Kane replacement.

Who knows with Veliz but I guess somewhat encouraging to hear Ange talk about him like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I always saw Richy as Kane’s replacement - hence the £60mil. Such a bad buy - another Conte legacy? Or didn’t he want him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Richarlison, given a proper run will score plenty. Bit premature to write him off before a ball has been kicked.

I am sure another striker has also been lined up as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not knee-jerk. Just my opinion on him since he came to the prem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we are relying on Richarlison for goals could be fighting against relegation

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
1 Vote
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available