So that is Aussie rules football !

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Eric_Draven (U20260)
posted 24 minutes ago
Very few people (apart from Gary Mabbut) have any complaints about the red cards - both could have gone before. I actually think we were getting on top while they had 11 on the pitch and we were actually playing better at that time. I really think Ange's tactics were a breath of fresh air and caused us too many problems, We are a young side, lack confidence and showed too much naivety when they went down to 10 and then 9. You could see that Spurs played with confidence and we were very nervous. Only James, Sterling and Palmer seemed to understand that you keep possession and move the defence when you have a player advantage, Jackson's runs were too predictable and badly timed, and other players were too eager to find the perfect pass. We gave away silly free kicks which nearly led to our downfall. Without those free kicks, Spurs only created one chance after their disallowed goal and our awful keeper nearly allowed that to squirm through his hands. Spurs and Ange come out with a lot of credit, but apart from our rush to finish off the game, we weren't as bad as many have said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You were not getting on top. Chelsea were a whisker away from going 2-0 down, and a bit of ball possession didn`t mean you were on top. 11 players on the pitch, game would have been over at half time. Even with nine men, Spurs created three good chances to equalise.

Fair enough you took advantage of the situation, but don`t kid yourself you would have got anything 11.v 11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Raging

Calm down and log off

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
Is this some sort of kangaroo court?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep out of it you flamin galah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bloody oath, that was a bit harsh

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Eric_Draven (U20260)
posted 24 minutes ago
Very few people (apart from Gary Mabbut) have any complaints about the red cards - both could have gone before. I actually think we were getting on top while they had 11 on the pitch and we were actually playing better at that time. I really think Ange's tactics were a breath of fresh air and caused us too many problems, We are a young side, lack confidence and showed too much naivety when they went down to 10 and then 9. You could see that Spurs played with confidence and we were very nervous. Only James, Sterling and Palmer seemed to understand that you keep possession and move the defence when you have a player advantage, Jackson's runs were too predictable and badly timed, and other players were too eager to find the perfect pass. We gave away silly free kicks which nearly led to our downfall. Without those free kicks, Spurs only created one chance after their disallowed goal and our awful keeper nearly allowed that to squirm through his hands. Spurs and Ange come out with a lot of credit, but apart from our rush to finish off the game, we weren't as bad as many have said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You were not getting on top. Chelsea were a whisker away from going 2-0 down, and a bit of ball possession didn`t mean you were on top. 11 players on the pitch, game would have been over at half time. Even with nine men, Spurs created three good chances to equalise.

Fair enough you took advantage of the situation, but don`t kid yourself you would have got anything 11.v 11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We had seven shots to 0 after your goal, scored 2 disallowed goals and you should have been down to 9 men after 22 minutes.

That shows we must have played OK after your goal

u230, you do get about

excuse me chopper wrong article

Boris, whats a galah ? I can't get hold of your Manc terminology

comment by H von H. (U16981)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris, whats a galah ? I can't get hold of your Manc terminology
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Australian parrot, we don't actually get that many in Manchester.

I was not impressed with the Australian parrot in charge of Spurs last night !

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 5 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Eric_Draven (U20260)
posted 24 minutes ago
Very few people (apart from Gary Mabbut) have any complaints about the red cards - both could have gone before. I actually think we were getting on top while they had 11 on the pitch and we were actually playing better at that time. I really think Ange's tactics were a breath of fresh air and caused us too many problems, We are a young side, lack confidence and showed too much naivety when they went down to 10 and then 9. You could see that Spurs played with confidence and we were very nervous. Only James, Sterling and Palmer seemed to understand that you keep possession and move the defence when you have a player advantage, Jackson's runs were too predictable and badly timed, and other players were too eager to find the perfect pass. We gave away silly free kicks which nearly led to our downfall. Without those free kicks, Spurs only created one chance after their disallowed goal and our awful keeper nearly allowed that to squirm through his hands. Spurs and Ange come out with a lot of credit, but apart from our rush to finish off the game, we weren't as bad as many have said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You were not getting on top. Chelsea were a whisker away from going 2-0 down, and a bit of ball possession didn`t mean you were on top. 11 players on the pitch, game would have been over at half time. Even with nine men, Spurs created three good chances to equalise.

Fair enough you took advantage of the situation, but don`t kid yourself you would have got anything 11.v 11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We had seven shots to 0 after your goal, scored 2 disallowed goals and you should have been down to 9 men after 22 minutes.

That shows we must have played OK after your goal

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't expect him to understand logic!