Farcical FFP

Literally not anything that you said you complete idiot. The PL doesn’t believe me either, what on earth are you going on about?! You said we’ve used more money from our owners than permitted, how on earth does that make any sense whatsoever, what do you think is permitted?! It’s the P&L, not the balance sheet!

That was us just about the revenue and sponsorship deals too.


Then next load of charges relate to not releasing full details of manager and player payments.

City clearly hiding the full details for a very good reason. They dont show you in a good light do they? 😂

You've been very naughty. Time to take the punishment now Melts. You're a Tinpot club. That's all you will ever be.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
Literally not anything that you said you complete idiot. The PL doesn’t believe me either, what on earth are you going on about?! You said we’ve used more money from our owners than permitted, how on earth does that make any sense whatsoever, what do you think is permitted?! It’s the P&L, not the balance sheet!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You've been hiding the full details of where the money has come from.

It states specifically on manager and player payments too on the next set of charges.

Where has that money come from if not your owner?

comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
Literally not anything that you said you complete idiot. The PL doesn’t believe me either, what on earth are you going on about?! You said we’ve used more money from our owners than permitted, how on earth does that make any sense whatsoever, what do you think is permitted?! It’s the P&L, not the balance sheet!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You've been hiding the full details of where the money has come from.

It states specifically on manager and player payments too on the next set of charges.

Where has that money come from if not your owner?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That’s not what you said, you said we put more in than permitted from our owner. You even said we could have just grown organically by him putting 90m a year in. I’ll repeat, how much do you think is permitted on a P&L?!

Also where did you get Brian Marwood being all over it from?

The club may well be guilty, you don’t clearly even understand the basics though and yet are confident to say for definite we’re guilty.

I’m not getting into arguing whether we are or not as I’ve said all along, none of us have the details to be able to do that. I’ll do exactly what I did with the CAS judgment and wait for the evidence to come out. That you can’t do that, despite it not even being the club you support, says a lot more about you than me. If we’re found guilty, then I’ll be a lot more annoyed with our owners than you will be.

comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
City haven't done anything wrong though guys remember......there's nothing to worry about.

😂😂😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the charges relates to pre 2014 when City were fined for breaking FFP.
City has not failed FFP ever since. Even the hacked emails related to between 2009 and 2013. So fans calling City cheats and bleating about tainted titles etc should have that in mind.

comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 54 minutes ago
That was us just about the revenue and sponsorship deals too.


Then next load of charges relate to not releasing full details of manager and player payments.

City clearly hiding the full details for a very good reason. They dont show you in a good light do they? 😂

You've been very naughty. Time to take the punishment now Melts. You're a Tinpot club. That's all you will ever be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Money paid to Mancini by Al Jazira was £1.7m before he joined City. So you think this amount is worth hiding from the PL?
Etisalat sponsorship deal was £15m per year. This deal was not looked at in the CAS case because it was time barred. The PL think it’s disguised equity funding. If Etisalat can provide evidence that the money came from them, then I don’t know how the PL will state otherwise.
Third issue relates to image rights. Again, City stated this publicly in their account. If the PL punishes City for this, then expect many PL clubs to go under as well.

mancini,
Why do you care about Everton's problems. Is City maybe next in line??

comment by Globaled (U7198)
posted 33 minutes ago
mancini,
Why do you care about Everton's problems. Is City maybe next in line??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United cannot be fined for breaking FFP while Everton gets a 10 points deduction.
The PL should be consistent about its own rules.

comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Globaled (U7198)
posted 33 minutes ago
mancini,
Why do you care about Everton's problems. Is City maybe next in line??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United cannot be fined for breaking FFP while Everton gets a 10 points deduction.
The PL should be consistent about its own rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but we own the PL, we can make up our own rules

comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
comment by Globaled (U7198)
posted 33 minutes ago
mancini,
Why do you care about Everton's problems. Is City maybe next in line??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United cannot be fined for breaking FFP while Everton gets a 10 points deduction.
The PL should be consistent about its own rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Did United break PL FFP rules?