So how long until we get another lame apology from them for Tierney and Hooper ruling out Elliott’s goal?
Seems to be a common occurrence that when Tierney is involved in our matches, a terrible decision goes against us.
He’s one ref that should be banned from reffing out matches.
…isnt he from Manchester too? 🤦🏻♂️
PGMOL
posted on 26/12/23
Klopp has, and rightly so.
posted on 26/12/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
Not seen post game press conference but hope Klopp has laid into them big time. This nonsense has to stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s the point?
posted on 26/12/23
so Arteta was right to complain about the bad officiating after all.
posted on 26/12/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
Not seen post game press conference but hope Klopp has laid into them big time. This nonsense has to stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It will just make it worse imo, they are bulletproof and absolutely shameless. Didn't see Elliott's goal but the first was never a foul.
posted on 26/12/23
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/12/23
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/12/23
Shouldn't the push on Salah be a penalty or indirect freekick then? He was pushed (foul) offside.
posted on 26/12/23
comment by Shaun M - supercalifragilisticOrtaisatrocious (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Shouldn't the push on Salah be a penalty or indirect freekick then? He was pushed (foul) offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would have been an advantage played though, wouldn’t it?
posted on 26/12/23
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Shaun M - supercalifragilisticOrtaisatrocious (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Shouldn't the push on Salah be a penalty or indirect freekick then? He was pushed (foul) offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would have been an advantage played though, wouldn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I hadn't considered that tbf.
posted on 27/12/23
comment by Shaun M - supercalifragilisticOrtaisatrocious (U9955)
posted 12 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Shaun M - supercalifragilisticOrtaisatrocious (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Shouldn't the push on Salah be a penalty or indirect freekick then? He was pushed (foul) offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would have been an advantage played though, wouldn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I hadn't considered that tbf.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn't, tbh. Salah was offside and in the keepers eyeline so the offside decision was correct. So any advantage being played for Liverpool should have ended because of that infringement and gone back to the original infringement.
It does raise an interesting point more generally though. People accept that not all contact in football is a foul, so in a hypothetical similar situation where everyone agreed that the contact by the defender was perfectly legal and put the player offside, is offside then the correct call? I can't see anyway that it wouldn't be without changing the laws.