The reputation of the Premier League

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
It can be argued they might have been forced or cornered into charging City with all this independent regulator business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It could.

comment by Cesario (U22905)
posted 9 hours, 22 minutes ago
OP,
On the contrary. If City are punished, that would enhance the reputation of the Premier league as a league where corruption doesn’t pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Non of the charges relate to corruption so that argument is straight out of the window

Mamba, outline the corruption charges for us please 👍

Of the 115 charges, those that would IMO fall within the dictionary definition of the word corruption are as follows

1.Failure to provide accurate financial reports for player and manager compensation x14

2.Breaches of Premier League profitability and sustainability regulations x7


There you go my saan.

I’d bin that dictionary if I was you

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 seconds ago
I’d bin that dictionary if I was you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I gave you what you asked for and this is all I get in return? I guess I answered your question so perfectly that you don't really have a comeback.

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 seconds ago
I’d bin that dictionary if I was you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I gave you what you asked for and this is all I get in return? I guess I answered your question so perfectly that you don't really have a comeback.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really didn’t, non of those charges relate to ‘corruption’.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 seconds ago
I’d bin that dictionary if I was you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I gave you what you asked for and this is all I get in return? I guess I answered your question so perfectly that you don't really have a comeback.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really didn’t, non of those charges relate to ‘corruption’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those are corrupt practices in some of those charges so no.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 13 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
I haven’t read the comments in this thread but I’m pretty sure the reason this is taking so long is because the PL don’t want to find City guilty. Finding City guilty automatically tarnishes the reputation of the PL. It’s already become a bit of a joke with the Everton/Forest point reductions, I reckon this is only the beginning and plenty more clubs will face similar sanctions next season (all before anything happens to City).
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That makes absolutely no sense. The PL have no choice in whether City are found guilty or not. If they didn’t want there to be a possibility of them being found guilty they wouldn’t have charged them in the first place.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rabbit holes and bat caves, same same.