Doesn't change the result, but am I the only one who saw the incident when BJ nearly scored a header and collided with the post.....was that not technically a high foot by the defender too? Attackers get pulled up for overhead kicks that are dangerous. Was this not the same?
posted on 6/5/24
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is
Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More blatant because Gakpo did an inward tuck triple reverse and pike landing.
posted on 6/5/24
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is
Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More blatant because Gakpo did an inward tuck triple reverse and pike landing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still far more of a pen than what Spurs fans are moaning about here. How can anyone moan after that not being given against them? Havertz would have got it for sure.
posted on 6/5/24
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is
Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂 was that the dive one ?
You will have your scarf on and I’ll have mine
The spurs penalty was very very blatant …..you boys cried when your man got kicked in the chest
Johnson , if braver , would have had his teeth kicked out
posted on 6/5/24
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
It was a clear cut penalty. I think VAR were swayed by Gary Neville’s commentary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Gakpo getting brought down in the area? Neville said he was looking for it and went down easy.
If that was Havertz it would be a 100% nailed on pen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn’t a pen and neither was that Havertz one. But yea if the Havertz one is given then the Gakpo one should have too
posted on 6/5/24
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
It was a clear cut penalty. I think VAR were swayed by Gary Neville’s commentary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Gakpo getting brought down in the area? Neville said he was looking for it and went down easy.
If that was Havertz it would be a 100% nailed on pen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn’t a pen and neither was that Havertz one. But yea if the Havertz one is given then the Gakpo one should have too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it shouldn't be a pen but in today's game the way it's reffed that's blatant.
posted on 6/5/24
If anything, havertz' was slightly more convincing than gakpo' effort.
posted on 6/5/24
comment by junction8 (U1074)
posted 16 seconds ago
If anything, havertz' was slightly more convincing than gakpo' effort.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way.
posted on 6/5/24
The Gakpo one was a definte pen.
posted on 6/5/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
The Gakpo one was a definte pen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Took out his standing leg ffs.
posted on 6/5/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
The Gakpo one was a definite dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed