"Rasmus Hoijlund shows true colours

Every MuEN article concerning City or United players are always "...show true colours after...:"

It's like they've learnt another click-bait phrase aside from ".... shocks the football world to the core" or "... and here's why", and is continuing to rinse the hell out of it until they find another click-baity phrase.

Then, when you read to satisfy the curiosity to find out what the "true colours" are, you will learn that Phil Foden commiserated and shook Akanji/Ake's hand after England progressed after defeating their respective countries. That was his "true colours", ffs.

comment by Jim Duffy (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
Did you share their article? Mission complete.

There is a culture of things being really bad/inaccurate so that people share and comment to say how bad it is and correct it. That gets more interaction than something that is factually correct and not controversial. Interaction is the only goal.

The first step in combatting this is to recognise it.

Let's practice.

"This is shiiiite"

*proceed to ignore*
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The irony here is you've also commented on the article giving it more traction...

comment by Jim Duffy (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Did you share their article? Mission complete.

There is a culture of things being really bad/inaccurate so that people share and comment to say how bad it is and correct it. That gets more interaction than something that is factually correct and not controversial. Interaction is the only goal.

The first step in combatting this is to recognise it.

Let's practice.

"This is shiiiite"

*proceed to ignore*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is shiiiiiite.

comment by Jim Duffy (U1734)
posted 46 minutes ago
You guys are meant to be clever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
Can't believe this is the state of journalism these days
——————
Christine McGuinness wows in stunning white bikini on holiday isle after split with Paddy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobby fingering through his heat mag

comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 5 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
Can't believe this is the state of journalism these days
——————
Christine McGuinness wows in stunning white bikini on holiday isle after split with Paddy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobby fingering through his heat mag
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He reads a few magazines

His original name Bobby Razzler was born from this.

comment by hounslows-finest (U6180)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 5 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
Can't believe this is the state of journalism these days
——————
Christine McGuinness wows in stunning white bikini on holiday isle after split with Paddy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobby fingering through his heat mag
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He reads a few magazines

His original name Bobby Razzler was born from this.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Feck me. Now I understood the context.

I did wonder who Bobby was in relation to the McGuiness', and how much pleasure he could actually give from fingering *through* his Heat magazine...

understand*

comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 6 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by Jim Duffy (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
Did you share their article? Mission complete.

There is a culture of things being really bad/inaccurate so that people share and comment to say how bad it is and correct it. That gets more interaction than something that is factually correct and not controversial. Interaction is the only goal.

The first step in combatting this is to recognise it.

Let's practice.

"This is shiiiite"

*proceed to ignore*
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The irony here is you've also commented on the article giving it more traction...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's like the police giving a terrorist attention. Someone has to bring them down and they/I are/am the appropriate people/person

This woman is MuEN clickbait personified. How is this supposed to be the same person?

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-34-framed-innocent-woman-29585944