Having watched us extensively under Ange now, both at the stadium and on TV, our problem has been come quite apparent.
Ange likes to play with three Pacey forwards,Pacey forwards thrive with space in behind. Our whole team plays high up the field, High defensive line, condensing the play and forcing teams to defend the edge of their own box.
The great Barca team featuring Messi, deco, iniesta and co played the same way which Ange is surely trying to emulate, difference being they had players with exceptional quality who could create things in tight spaces.
We are inadvertently stiffling our forwards, denying them of what they need most - space. What makes it worse is that our fullbacks invert and wingers are often 1 Vs 2 which obviously lessons the odds of them being effective. We are asking an awful lot of them and in myind we need to mix it up with full backs overlapping.
Also udogie especially is exhausting himself covering the length of the pitch over and over, he just didn't have the legs to get back at Murphy yesterday despite being a strong quick player.
We need to adapt, sometimes take the foot off the gas, let teams have some possession and use the strengths of the front three.
The offensive dilemma
posted on 2/9/24
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ange is just out of his depth. In game management clueless. Not the right subs, not timing it right.
You can play a high line with players not suited to the system, Lewis Dunk/van hecke Brighton and Hove Albion. In fact Hinshelwood a centre midfielder right footed playing left back , Veltman not exactly dynamic at right back. I keep pointing this out im stunned nobody sees the similarities. It can be done quite easily!
A better manager gets better results with this group of players as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our high line yester was pretty effective. Breached twice, both could have been goals.
But Ipswich breached City's highline.....Thats the thing with high line its risk and reward.
If we cut out the individual errors, tthen its not a problem.
Isaks goal yesterday, i do not mean to be critical of Maddison, because we had just gone through a spell where our high press turned over possession several times. Madders pressed Joelinton hard, but couldn't go too hard as he was on a yellow and its a physical mismatch anyhow. If he had been a bit smarter, pressed without committing, blocking forward passes rather than lunging in to take possession then the through ball never happens.
Like i say, not wanting to criticise Maddisons effort whatsoever, but it lacked a few smarts.
When pressing its not just about trying to recover the ball, its about making players go where you want them to go. Pressing isnt just getting close to a player, its details such as your positioning, the angle of your body all with the purpose of forcing players away from danger or into other traps. Madders pressed in what was quite a wide open CM, once beaten Joelinton had all the time in the world to pick a pass.
You can see their goal here. About 2m30sec. Joelinton has only one pass option and he's gonna be pressed by Werner. If you then freeze at the moment of the pass, 3 defenders are turned and running and Romero is stood still, chest on to the passer. The fact he doesnt go with his runner draws Radu over leaving Isak unmarked for the tap in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgAjXE3CiG0
This is a few details, some slightly better decision making and the need for Romero to quit basic errors..
Its not the fundamentally flawed tactical disaster some are painting it as. We were, in fact, 4 at the back, man to man in midfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The manager persists in playing the high line when our number one run-back defender is not playing.
So what happened.
Our back four were all up on the half-way line , Newcastle hoofed the ball and easy won the foot race, easy tap in for second goal....points lost
I'm getting very disappointed with Aussieglue.......the guy just won't adjust tactics.
The Arsenholes may well eat us for breakfast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO when VDV isn't playing we park the bus and abandon the press
Have you noticed how City still play the high line without Walker, their pace machine?
The high line is not all about speed of recovery.
At the very least defenders have to get the basics right and Romero didnt for the Isak goal. Watch the clip i shared above. His statuesque defending of that situation let the runner go and caused Radu to leave Isak to cover.
If next week, Arsenal and their high line stand and watch while Son runs through, then that will be a fault of the players not the system.
You are demonstrating a limited understanding of what the causes of the problems are, simply identifying it as The Tactics. It isnt.
What is also notable about that goal is that we had a back 4, so its not as if we're caught with inverted full backs up the pitch, they are where they are meant to be defensively...as were the CBs. Once Joelinton breaks Maddison's press, 3 of the 4 defenders start to drop, Romero stands still.. A bit like him wondering around for that cross for Vardy's goal, if you do not do the basics right then the system doesnt matter. Low block high line, mistakes get punished.
A high line is a higher risk, so it will yield chances from time to time, but all the best, more progressive teams play it
posted on 2/9/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ange is just out of his depth. In game management clueless. Not the right subs, not timing it right.
You can play a high line with players not suited to the system, Lewis Dunk/van hecke Brighton and Hove Albion. In fact Hinshelwood a centre midfielder right footed playing left back , Veltman not exactly dynamic at right back. I keep pointing this out im stunned nobody sees the similarities. It can be done quite easily!
A better manager gets better results with this group of players as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our high line yester was pretty effective. Breached twice, both could have been goals.
But Ipswich breached City's highline.....Thats the thing with high line its risk and reward.
If we cut out the individual errors, tthen its not a problem.
Isaks goal yesterday, i do not mean to be critical of Maddison, because we had just gone through a spell where our high press turned over possession several times. Madders pressed Joelinton hard, but couldn't go too hard as he was on a yellow and its a physical mismatch anyhow. If he had been a bit smarter, pressed without committing, blocking forward passes rather than lunging in to take possession then the through ball never happens.
Like i say, not wanting to criticise Maddisons effort whatsoever, but it lacked a few smarts.
When pressing its not just about trying to recover the ball, its about making players go where you want them to go. Pressing isnt just getting close to a player, its details such as your positioning, the angle of your body all with the purpose of forcing players away from danger or into other traps. Madders pressed in what was quite a wide open CM, once beaten Joelinton had all the time in the world to pick a pass.
You can see their goal here. About 2m30sec. Joelinton has only one pass option and he's gonna be pressed by Werner. If you then freeze at the moment of the pass, 3 defenders are turned and running and Romero is stood still, chest on to the passer. The fact he doesnt go with his runner draws Radu over leaving Isak unmarked for the tap in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgAjXE3CiG0
This is a few details, some slightly better decision making and the need for Romero to quit basic errors..
Its not the fundamentally flawed tactical disaster some are painting it as. We were, in fact, 4 at the back, man to man in midfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The manager persists in playing the high line when our number one run-back defender is not playing.
So what happened.
Our back four were all up on the half-way line , Newcastle hoofed the ball and easy won the foot race, easy tap in for second goal....points lost
I'm getting very disappointed with Aussieglue.......the guy just won't adjust tactics.
The Arsenholes may well eat us for breakfast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO when VDV isn't playing we park the bus and abandon the press
Have you noticed how City still play the high line without Walker, their pace machine?
The high line is not all about speed of recovery.
At the very least defenders have to get the basics right and Romero didnt for the Isak goal. Watch the clip i shared above. His statuesque defending of that situation let the runner go and caused Radu to leave Isak to cover.
If next week, Arsenal and their high line stand and watch while Son runs through, then that will be a fault of the players not the system.
You are demonstrating a limited understanding of what the causes of the problems are, simply identifying it as The Tactics. It isnt.
What is also notable about that goal is that we had a back 4, so its not as if we're caught with inverted full backs up the pitch, they are where they are meant to be defensively...as were the CBs. Once Joelinton breaks Maddison's press, 3 of the 4 defenders start to drop, Romero stands still.. A bit like him wondering around for that cross for Vardy's goal, if you do not do the basics right then the system doesnt matter. Low block high line, mistakes get punished.
A high line is a higher risk, so it will yield chances from time to time, but all the best, more progressive teams play it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously did not watch the game.
They out ran our back four for their second goal.
Micky Van De Ven was not playing.
posted on 2/9/24
Ange is like Klopp from Wish. Full throttle but no real plan B. Players sent off? ....the high line will be fine 😂
Great to watch but I'd be amazed if he can win anything with such a predictable set up. Way better than Jose or conte ball though.
Ange doesn't know how to make adjustments to control games against the good sides.
posted on 2/9/24
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ange is just out of his depth. In game management clueless. Not the right subs, not timing it right.
You can play a high line with players not suited to the system, Lewis Dunk/van hecke Brighton and Hove Albion. In fact Hinshelwood a centre midfielder right footed playing left back , Veltman not exactly dynamic at right back. I keep pointing this out im stunned nobody sees the similarities. It can be done quite easily!
A better manager gets better results with this group of players as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our high line yester was pretty effective. Breached twice, both could have been goals.
But Ipswich breached City's highline.....Thats the thing with high line its risk and reward.
If we cut out the individual errors, tthen its not a problem.
Isaks goal yesterday, i do not mean to be critical of Maddison, because we had just gone through a spell where our high press turned over possession several times. Madders pressed Joelinton hard, but couldn't go too hard as he was on a yellow and its a physical mismatch anyhow. If he had been a bit smarter, pressed without committing, blocking forward passes rather than lunging in to take possession then the through ball never happens.
Like i say, not wanting to criticise Maddisons effort whatsoever, but it lacked a few smarts.
When pressing its not just about trying to recover the ball, its about making players go where you want them to go. Pressing isnt just getting close to a player, its details such as your positioning, the angle of your body all with the purpose of forcing players away from danger or into other traps. Madders pressed in what was quite a wide open CM, once beaten Joelinton had all the time in the world to pick a pass.
You can see their goal here. About 2m30sec. Joelinton has only one pass option and he's gonna be pressed by Werner. If you then freeze at the moment of the pass, 3 defenders are turned and running and Romero is stood still, chest on to the passer. The fact he doesnt go with his runner draws Radu over leaving Isak unmarked for the tap in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgAjXE3CiG0
This is a few details, some slightly better decision making and the need for Romero to quit basic errors..
Its not the fundamentally flawed tactical disaster some are painting it as. We were, in fact, 4 at the back, man to man in midfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The manager persists in playing the high line when our number one run-back defender is not playing.
So what happened.
Our back four were all up on the half-way line , Newcastle hoofed the ball and easy won the foot race, easy tap in for second goal....points lost
I'm getting very disappointed with Aussieglue.......the guy just won't adjust tactics.
The Arsenholes may well eat us for breakfast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO when VDV isn't playing we park the bus and abandon the press
Have you noticed how City still play the high line without Walker, their pace machine?
The high line is not all about speed of recovery.
At the very least defenders have to get the basics right and Romero didnt for the Isak goal. Watch the clip i shared above. His statuesque defending of that situation let the runner go and caused Radu to leave Isak to cover.
If next week, Arsenal and their high line stand and watch while Son runs through, then that will be a fault of the players not the system.
You are demonstrating a limited understanding of what the causes of the problems are, simply identifying it as The Tactics. It isnt.
What is also notable about that goal is that we had a back 4, so its not as if we're caught with inverted full backs up the pitch, they are where they are meant to be defensively...as were the CBs. Once Joelinton breaks Maddison's press, 3 of the 4 defenders start to drop, Romero stands still.. A bit like him wondering around for that cross for Vardy's goal, if you do not do the basics right then the system doesnt matter. Low block high line, mistakes get punished.
A high line is a higher risk, so it will yield chances from time to time, but all the best, more progressive teams play it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously did not watch the game.
They out ran our back four for their second goal.
Micky Van De Ven was not playing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, Looks Like Modric understands what's going on with Aussieglue....and you do not.
No, you don't abandon the high line,...you adjust it to the talents of the players on the pitch,... that is, the players on both sides!
posted on 2/9/24
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ange is just out of his depth. In game management clueless. Not the right subs, not timing it right.
You can play a high line with players not suited to the system, Lewis Dunk/van hecke Brighton and Hove Albion. In fact Hinshelwood a centre midfielder right footed playing left back , Veltman not exactly dynamic at right back. I keep pointing this out im stunned nobody sees the similarities. It can be done quite easily!
A better manager gets better results with this group of players as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our high line yester was pretty effective. Breached twice, both could have been goals.
But Ipswich breached City's highline.....Thats the thing with high line its risk and reward.
If we cut out the individual errors, tthen its not a problem.
Isaks goal yesterday, i do not mean to be critical of Maddison, because we had just gone through a spell where our high press turned over possession several times. Madders pressed Joelinton hard, but couldn't go too hard as he was on a yellow and its a physical mismatch anyhow. If he had been a bit smarter, pressed without committing, blocking forward passes rather than lunging in to take possession then the through ball never happens.
Like i say, not wanting to criticise Maddisons effort whatsoever, but it lacked a few smarts.
When pressing its not just about trying to recover the ball, its about making players go where you want them to go. Pressing isnt just getting close to a player, its details such as your positioning, the angle of your body all with the purpose of forcing players away from danger or into other traps. Madders pressed in what was quite a wide open CM, once beaten Joelinton had all the time in the world to pick a pass.
You can see their goal here. About 2m30sec. Joelinton has only one pass option and he's gonna be pressed by Werner. If you then freeze at the moment of the pass, 3 defenders are turned and running and Romero is stood still, chest on to the passer. The fact he doesnt go with his runner draws Radu over leaving Isak unmarked for the tap in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgAjXE3CiG0
This is a few details, some slightly better decision making and the need for Romero to quit basic errors..
Its not the fundamentally flawed tactical disaster some are painting it as. We were, in fact, 4 at the back, man to man in midfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The manager persists in playing the high line when our number one run-back defender is not playing.
So what happened.
Our back four were all up on the half-way line , Newcastle hoofed the ball and easy won the foot race, easy tap in for second goal....points lost
I'm getting very disappointed with Aussieglue.......the guy just won't adjust tactics.
The Arsenholes may well eat us for breakfast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO when VDV isn't playing we park the bus and abandon the press
Have you noticed how City still play the high line without Walker, their pace machine?
The high line is not all about speed of recovery.
At the very least defenders have to get the basics right and Romero didnt for the Isak goal. Watch the clip i shared above. His statuesque defending of that situation let the runner go and caused Radu to leave Isak to cover.
If next week, Arsenal and their high line stand and watch while Son runs through, then that will be a fault of the players not the system.
You are demonstrating a limited understanding of what the causes of the problems are, simply identifying it as The Tactics. It isnt.
What is also notable about that goal is that we had a back 4, so its not as if we're caught with inverted full backs up the pitch, they are where they are meant to be defensively...as were the CBs. Once Joelinton breaks Maddison's press, 3 of the 4 defenders start to drop, Romero stands still.. A bit like him wondering around for that cross for Vardy's goal, if you do not do the basics right then the system doesnt matter. Low block high line, mistakes get punished.
A high line is a higher risk, so it will yield chances from time to time, but all the best, more progressive teams play it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously did not watch the game.
They out ran our back four for their second goal.
Micky Van De Ven was not playing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, Looks Like Modric understands what's going on with Aussieglue....and you do not.
No, you don't abandon the high line,...you adjust it to the talents of the players on the pitch,... that is, the players on both sides!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree with both of your simple assessments of the problems.
What happens if Romero runs with the player he is responsible for? He's no slouch. He can either make a challenge or block, at worst the attacker shoots from a tough angle but the easy pass to Isak iant on as Radu is marking him, not covering the absent Romero
posted on 2/9/24
Ange is a conviction manager believing that the downside of an inconsistent message to dumb players would result in worse outcomes than sticking with the plan and trying to do better.
posted on 2/9/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Tarrico_sees_red (U5595)
posted 14 minutes ago
I have written Johnson off though👍🏻
Surely you’re old enough to remember what quality footballers look like on the ball?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes...i was a season ticket holder and saw Bales debut and Modrics.
Both with unspectacular starts to their Spurs careers. What was that stat about Bale, Spurs didnt win in his first 24 appearances. Clearly a shiiit player, also like Modric who struggled for ages to settle.
I also remember the step up that the likes of Demebele and Vertonghen achieved . How Walker went from error prone poor defender to top class.
SO yes, I do remember what quality players look like. I have seen these players first hand and watched them become top class players despite less than impressive starts .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absoloutely not having a dig mate but Bales start was good as was Modrics. Just in a struggling side with interference Commoli/Jol/Ramos/ Harry.
Bale went down quickly to injury and returned under the wretched Ramos. However 8 games, 2 goals and he looked brilliant. He was also played on the wing with Jol. Yet Harry revises history that Bale was a leper could never win and had never played on the wing.
The first time i see Modric you could see he was a player, movement, always avaliable and this Harry nonsense that he was bullied off the ball he was not. 3 goals and 6 assists.
Both you could tell would be great, if only we would of kept them and Berbatov eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im not making the case that BJ is the next Bale, but Bale started barely 45 games for us over his first 3 season. He became a regular in 11/12 and it wasnt until 12/13 that he really hit the heights with 21 goals.
My point being that to right off Johnson after 1 season, 5 gaols and 11 assists, is stupid. Bale took 4 seasons to return stats like that, regardless of how good he looked.
BJ may never improve, Im just not writing him off after 1 season. There are loads of players out there who step up after a season or 2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The criticism of BJ is odd his returns the ones that ACTUALLY matter goals and assists are up there in the premier league but people do not want to hear it. Not possesion, not shots none of them count.
Not writing him off either, completely get where your coming from.
posted on 2/9/24
comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 5 hours, 1 minute ago
Yet Harry revises history that Bale was a leper could never win and had never played on the wing.
The first time i see Modric you could see he was a player, movement, always avaliable and this Harry nonsense that he was bullied off the ball he was not. 3 goals and 6 assists.
----------------------
You are revising history. Loads of people had doubts about Modric getting bullied in midifeld when he first joined. That's why he was stuck on the left. Harry moved him in the middle.
And as for Bale, your version is rubbish as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not think i am revising history.
Modric played as a cm alongside Jenas, got his first assist against Chelsea three games in the centre of midfield. We had dos santos, lennon, bentley, bale on the left. He was playing further forward at points behind the centre forward. I remember Newcastle away. He did get moved on the left under Harry it is a great Harry soundbite but revisionist. He was showing to be a great player.
As for Bale, i was at Old Trafford on his debut he was brilliant we lost 1-0 he started on the wing ahead of Benny. Was brilliant against Fulham goal and an assist then was playing really well against Arsenal scoring that free kick. First time left back was against villa in the 4-4 if i rem correctly.
Got injured and came back under a woeful Ramos was young and struggled. Always looked a player the injury means people dont realise just how good he looked.
posted on 2/9/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 3 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ange is just out of his depth. In game management clueless. Not the right subs, not timing it right.
You can play a high line with players not suited to the system, Lewis Dunk/van hecke Brighton and Hove Albion. In fact Hinshelwood a centre midfielder right footed playing left back , Veltman not exactly dynamic at right back. I keep pointing this out im stunned nobody sees the similarities. It can be done quite easily!
A better manager gets better results with this group of players as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our high line yester was pretty effective. Breached twice, both could have been goals.
But Ipswich breached City's highline.....Thats the thing with high line its risk and reward.
If we cut out the individual errors, tthen its not a problem.
Isaks goal yesterday, i do not mean to be critical of Maddison, because we had just gone through a spell where our high press turned over possession several times. Madders pressed Joelinton hard, but couldn't go too hard as he was on a yellow and its a physical mismatch anyhow. If he had been a bit smarter, pressed without committing, blocking forward passes rather than lunging in to take possession then the through ball never happens.
Like i say, not wanting to criticise Maddisons effort whatsoever, but it lacked a few smarts.
When pressing its not just about trying to recover the ball, its about making players go where you want them to go. Pressing isnt just getting close to a player, its details such as your positioning, the angle of your body all with the purpose of forcing players away from danger or into other traps. Madders pressed in what was quite a wide open CM, once beaten Joelinton had all the time in the world to pick a pass.
You can see their goal here. About 2m30sec. Joelinton has only one pass option and he's gonna be pressed by Werner. If you then freeze at the moment of the pass, 3 defenders are turned and running and Romero is stood still, chest on to the passer. The fact he doesnt go with his runner draws Radu over leaving Isak unmarked for the tap in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgAjXE3CiG0
This is a few details, some slightly better decision making and the need for Romero to quit basic errors..
Its not the fundamentally flawed tactical disaster some are painting it as. We were, in fact, 4 at the back, man to man in midfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The manager persists in playing the high line when our number one run-back defender is not playing.
So what happened.
Our back four were all up on the half-way line , Newcastle hoofed the ball and easy won the foot race, easy tap in for second goal....points lost
I'm getting very disappointed with Aussieglue.......the guy just won't adjust tactics.
The Arsenholes may well eat us for breakfast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO when VDV isn't playing we park the bus and abandon the press
Have you noticed how City still play the high line without Walker, their pace machine?
The high line is not all about speed of recovery.
At the very least defenders have to get the basics right and Romero didnt for the Isak goal. Watch the clip i shared above. His statuesque defending of that situation let the runner go and caused Radu to leave Isak to cover.
If next week, Arsenal and their high line stand and watch while Son runs through, then that will be a fault of the players not the system.
You are demonstrating a limited understanding of what the causes of the problems are, simply identifying it as The Tactics. It isnt.
What is also notable about that goal is that we had a back 4, so its not as if we're caught with inverted full backs up the pitch, they are where they are meant to be defensively...as were the CBs. Once Joelinton breaks Maddison's press, 3 of the 4 defenders start to drop, Romero stands still.. A bit like him wondering around for that cross for Vardy's goal, if you do not do the basics right then the system doesnt matter. Low block high line, mistakes get punished.
A high line is a higher risk, so it will yield chances from time to time, but all the best, more progressive teams play it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously did not watch the game.
They out ran our back four for their second goal.
Micky Van De Ven was not playing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, Looks Like Modric understands what's going on with Aussieglue....and you do not.
No, you don't abandon the high line,...you adjust it to the talents of the players on the pitch,... that is, the players on both sides!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree with both of your simple assessments of the problems.
What happens if Romero runs with the player he is responsible for? He's no slouch. He can either make a challenge or block, at worst the attacker shoots from a tough angle but the easy pass to Isak iant on as Radu is marking him, not covering the absent Romero
------------------------------------------------------------
When will you understand that this manager has to vary his tactics. ATM he is a one trick pony.
you ask what happens....what happens...yes what happens if Romero is beaten in the footrace?
Well he did get beat, and...they scored the winning goal.
posted on 2/9/24
The scariest thing is, there are still plenty of Levyista`s out there who continue to run their tongue along Levy`s arce crack and think all is rosey in the Hotspur way flower beds.
I`d love to know what type of drugs they take.