INEOS

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
I don’t know what you guys were expecting after such a short space of time? For signings it’s way too early, same with ineos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree it's too early on the new players....

Are we not allowed to comment on how they handled the ETH fiasco over the summer then?

comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
I don’t know what you guys were expecting after such a short space of time? For signings it’s way too early, same with ineos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree it's too early on the new players....

Are we not allowed to comment on how they handled the ETH fiasco over the summer then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a difference between commenting on one decision and proclaiming you're 'done with' the whole project, with all of its fundamenral restructuring of the organisation, operations, stadium exploration, etc. based on thinking that one decision (made before the team was fully in place and with no preferred elite candidates available) was bad.

Very out of character for comic book guy to be negative, what's wrong?

comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
I don’t know what you guys were expecting after such a short space of time? For signings it’s way too early, same with ineos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree it's too early on the new players....

Are we not allowed to comment on how they handled the ETH fiasco over the summer then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a difference between commenting on one decision and proclaiming you're 'done with' the whole project, with all of its fundamenral restructuring of the organisation, operations, stadium exploration, etc. based on thinking that one decision (made before the team was fully in place and with no preferred elite candidates available) was bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly RR.

But yes SE85 - it’s fine to comment on that scenario but overall I think it’s fair to say that in such a short space of time INEOS have been great. Look at our transfers in and out, stadium, training ground etc etc. one error out of many big decisions is fine by me.

Maybe the Manager they wanted to get wasn't available so decided to stick with Ten for another season. Thats the only way it makes sense to keep him.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 2 minutes ago
Maybe the Manager they wanted to get wasn't available so decided to stick with Ten for another season. Thats the only way it makes sense to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this is exactly what happened. If results don’t come in, I’m sure he’ll be sacked and Ruud will take over as interim. Then if someone undeniable is available, they’ll get him.

comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
I don’t know what you guys were expecting after such a short space of time? For signings it’s way too early, same with ineos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree it's too early on the new players....

Are we not allowed to comment on how they handled the ETH fiasco over the summer then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a difference between commenting on one decision and proclaiming you're 'done with' the whole project, with all of its fundamenral restructuring of the organisation, operations, stadium exploration, etc. based on thinking that one decision (made before the team was fully in place and with no preferred elite candidates available) was bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm definitely not done with the project. I have consistently said today they are already on a sticky wicket though. Football seasons are 9 months long and are too precious to just throw away. That's practically what they did by going back on their decision. They left him in an impossible position instead of doing what was needed. It's poor leadership.

They can obviously make amends for it though over next week or two. It's time to wake up and deal with the reality we face. He isn't good enough and he's doing more harm than good now. Even our more talented players in the squad look lost.

‘These ineos characters think this is facking cycling’

Let’s hope so. From what I’ve heard they facked that up too.

He will probably win you the Europa League.
Then it will be 3 trophies in 3 seasons.

But you will continue toget these bad PL.results and finish about 7th

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 20 hours, 28 minutes ago
Maybe the Manager they wanted to get wasn't available so decided to stick with Ten for another season. Thats the only way it makes sense to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but you wouldn’t then change the back room staff to ETH, paying all that money to get rid then all the money to get new in. Only for a new manager to want his back room staff putting in place. You also wouldn’t go out and splash £200m on his signings.

They have backed ETH fully, which is what you would want from your owners, just looks a total mistake!