Arsenal 2 Liverpool 2

*Man Utd

comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 31 minutes ago
Both sets of fans will be slightly disappointed that they didn't win the game. But the Spurs and Nan Utd results gave cheered me up 😀
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't give a crap about the United or Spurs results. I just wanted a win today and unfortunately we couldn't break you down enough. We didn't really manufacture any clear chances apart from the two goals and second half that wasn't good enough when we dominated most of it. But when up against four centre backs and two defensive midfielders it's tough to create, even TAA struggled in that sense despite one of his trademark passes creating one of the goals.

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.

Yeah well you got away with playing basketball last season so suck it up.

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like VvD should have been sent off by that explanation...

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like VvD should have been sent off by that explanation...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One of your players kicked the ball away and nothing was done

comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 28 minutes ago
One of your players kicked the ball away and nothing was done
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Could have got a yellow for that tbf, if the ref thought he was trying to delay the free kick.

Really doubt Luis Diaz being on a yellow would have changed the game though.