Why didnt the bbc go get some actual hard evidence instead of using the above words for everything in that 'program'? couple that with some dodgy printouts i could have created in 5 mins, only speaking to axed board members/owners of businesses that he failed to turn around, and this robert burns guy who looked like he was reading from a script, it was a complete stitch up.
WATP
proposed, alleged, apparently
posted on 20/10/11
out side his house whispering
outside some wee office in London whispering
away to France catch some sun do some whispering
posted on 20/10/11
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/10/11
He flew to Monaco to stand where Whyte stood for a pic
posted on 20/10/11
aye dos but no even a quote from the bank to back it up
posted on 20/10/11
Alistair Johnson number 1. Told to resign and said No Surrender.
Bring him back
posted on 20/10/11
Complete bollox, is this what the BBC are spending YOUR money on ????????????
posted on 20/10/11
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 9 minutes ago
certainly little balance in it.
In saying that is any of it is true and we have to assume some of it is then it is a concern.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
So, for example, we should be concerned that some guy got done for fraud 3 years AFTER his last involvement with CW?
Desperate mud-slinging nonsense.
posted on 20/10/11
Desperate mud-slinging nonsense.
======
very much so.
posted on 20/10/11
Complete and utter tripe.
Hopefully they're banned for as long as possible. Forever.
Pile of utter 5hite!!!
posted on 20/10/11
do we ban there TV cameras?
I guess we get paid for that.
Still think we should though.