First John Terry for just being John Terry for the last year or so and now Ferdinand chants at the Genk game last night coupled with racist comments from a s-cummy Chelsea fan on Ferdinand's Twitter page.
Classy, very classy. Looks like we'll leave it to Fulham to be only club in Fulham from now on eh?
Lack of class.....
posted on 2/11/11
I am waiting for a verdict to be reached by an authoritative body before judging JT, not supporting or otherwise. I only wish others would do the same.
.................
Fair comment and we all know the media love any dirt on players but in JT's case there are just too many stories and he's never actually refuted any in the courts as many other wronged celebs have
posted on 2/11/11
That's fair enough, but i'm sure people have pointed out that black and blind look pretty similar when you lip read.
posted on 2/11/11
Chicken
We may get behind our team for every footballing move they make, good or bad, but when it becomes a moralistic one, i think the siuation should be looked at on an individual basis.
And the same goes for all fans of all clubs, regarding their subsequent player or players.
=========================================
But weren't you all defending Harry (Correctly so in my book) when the press were insinuating he is a crook, saying lets wait until the trial.
posted on 2/11/11
SANDSEND,
But weren't you all defending Harry (Correctly so in my book) when the press were insinuating he is a crook, saying lets wait until the trial.
============================
Firstly, I dont actually remember saying anything of the sort.
Plus, i haven't seen any video evidence to make any personal judgement on the crime. Just out of interest, have you?
posted on 2/11/11
I can't talk about this bloody man any more, but I will say this - he's a . But he probably has a side to his story too. The fact that he's so rich (you can debate whether it's deserving) sort of prevents one from empathizing with him... But just because he's rich doesn't mean that he's happy.
Lots of people are s but there's usually a reason.
posted on 2/11/11
chelsea fc
posted on 2/11/11
"Firstly, I dont actually remember saying anything of the sort."
Sorry mate, not you personally, I meant spurs fans as a collective on here
Plus, i haven't seen any video evidence to make any personal judgement on the crime. Just out of interest, have you.
Not any video evidence but there were some financial transfer notes in the paper which were purported to be a touch dodgy, but then again, it could be another part of their agenda I guess, they build them up, place them on a pedestal, then lob rocks at them
posted on 2/11/11
SANDSEND,
I must admit, i haven't seen or read any official evidence to support the case - nor would i probably understand it even if i had .
If i had seen any evidence for or against, that would enable me to make an opinion either way, then i would do so. And fairly.
posted on 2/11/11
Lets be honest here, not many of us would understand it .
However, a friend here in the city tell me it leaves a hell of a lot of questions to be answered.
Same goes with me and JT, if it is proven, he will get it in the neck, have you seen the incident, is there any truth in the accusation in your mind
posted on 2/11/11
SANDSEND,
Yes i have seen the video. And its quite obvious what he is saying.
Ok, the best barrister in the world might argue he said the word "blind" rather than "black, but its quite easy to lipread if i'm honest.
The fact that the word "blind" had nothing to do with the context of what was happening also leads me to my own personal conclusion.