or to join or start a new Discussion

9 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

vermaelen at left back

am i the only one who thinks it would be a massive waste of such an excellent CB to play him out of position at LB like many people are suggesting. surely we would be better off keeping vermaelen at the heat of our defence and actually get a half decent player whos main position is LB

posted on 16/6/11

he wont play LB, despite a few fans putting him there in their starting XI

he wil lbe CB - end of story.

If Clichy goes we need to buy a LB IMO....

posted on 16/6/11

Vermaelen at LB would be about as pointless as the 'Nasri' experiment where he was deployed as a holding midfielder. Would Utd play Vidic as a full back? Or Chelsea use Terry that way? No. Desperation... Lunatics, Asylums - that's why we employ a man like Wenger - because if we listened to half these idiots 'in-the-know' we'd be in League One by now!

posted on 16/6/11

I really hope Wenger is strengthening properly this summer and it's not going to be the 6th summer in a row of 'Make Do And Mend'.

Wenger seems to jigg around his current players rather than replace and it has cost us ever since he didn't replace Vieira. I hope he replaces each player who leaves, as well as bringing in extra tallent.

I would like to see... (if we assume these players leave).

New GK to be first choice with Szenzznznznzey as no.2 and Fabianski as 3rd. (Almunia leaves)

New CB to play with Vermaelen
New LB to replace Clichy
New DM to be first choice and Song is cover
New midfeilder to replace Nasri or Fabregas (I don't believe both will leave, Fabregas seems more likely to go with Kroenke willing to pay Nasri off.
New striker to replace Bendtner

posted on 16/6/11

New LB to replace Clichy


Izagurre at Celtic?

posted on 16/6/11

We have Botelho, Tarore and Gibbs fighting for LB position. Is anyone of them good enuf to replace Clichy? I m dieing to see Pedro Botelho because he is Brazilian of course.

posted on 16/6/11

It would be a massive waste of a quality centre back

comment by Sanj (U1142)

posted on 16/6/11

I agree. We need TV as one of the players in our spine. He also brings the ball forward from defence which you need when you play against teams that just park the bus. And we will have lots of those in home games.

posted on 16/6/11

Vermaelen to the left of me
Sagna to the right
Here I am stuck in the middle with Djourou



posted on 16/6/11

Vermaelen at LB would be about as pointless as the 'Nasri' experiment where he was deployed as a holding midfielder. Would Utd play Vidic as a full back? Or Chelsea use Terry that way? No. Desperation... Lunatics, Asylums - that's why we employ a man like Wenger - because if we listened to half these idiots 'in-the-know' we'd be in League One by now!

-----

It's nothing like your examples, and not nearly as crazy. Vermaelan plays left back regularly for Belgium and also played there often at Ajax. That is not equivalent with Terry or Vidic's experience. They don't play fullback.
I don't really have a strong opinion on this - if Wenger were to decide on TV as 1st choice lb next season, I would find it interesting and assume that a lot of training and thought had gone into the decision. If we buy a lb to replace Clichy, I'd also understand that as it would be the more conventional thing to do. But I don't think playing him at lb is crazy talk.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 3 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available