Did you ever hate the fact that your club signed a particular player?
Hated signing?
posted on 17/6/11
not before but after certainly. viduka for a start.
didnt like mcdonald either, fat lazy wee mole.
posted on 17/6/11
Flo
I thought it was the bizz at the time but looking back he was a terrible signing.
posted on 17/6/11
seen the fixture list zico?
celtic 1st three games
hibs away
aberdeen away
united at home
think we should have a home game the second game but postponed it for the dublin cup or witever its called.
even so though, first 4 games and we get those 3 teams, ouch.
posted on 17/6/11
dcooper
i reckon thats only because of the fee though, he had a good goal record.
problem with flo was, he wasnt larsson.
posted on 17/6/11
"seen the fixture list zico?
celtic 1st three games
hibs away
aberdeen away
united at home"
FFS!
Ah well, at least we get a few toughies out the way early on.
posted on 17/6/11
Keny
I think the problem was he was not built for the SPL.He never really fancied it for me.The fee was a gutter but he was playing great before he came to us.
posted on 17/6/11
i thought flo was a good player at chelsea, when you signed him i was worried.
man i would kill for a player of a third of larssons calibre.
posted on 17/6/11
Larsson and Laudrup have been the best ive seen playing in scotland maybe Gazza up there aswell.
more to the question in hand though, Charlie Adam I hated!
posted on 17/6/11
Egil Ostenstad and Emerson knew both of them were long past it or never had it yet we signed the duds.