Although this is the amount paid to agents, it's fair to say it will be more or less proportional to transfer spending. No surprise Man City are top, but the rest?
1. Man City £9.7m
2. Tottenham £7.6m
3. Liverpool £7m
4. Chelsea £6.5m
5. Newcastle £6.3m
6. Arsenal £4.6m
7. Man Utd £4.5m
8. Blackburn £4.2m
9. Sunderland £3.7m
10. Aston Villa £3.2m
11. Everton £2.9m
12. QPR £2.5m
13. Stoke £2.2m
14. Bolton £1.9m
15. West Brom £1.3m
16. Wolves £1.1m
17. Fulham £0.9m
18. Norwich £0.7m
19. Wigan £0.66m
20. Swansea £0.24m
Information relating to the cost of football agents for the 2010-11 season has been released as a result of the recently-introduced FA Football Agents Regulations, all clubs must now declare the amount they pay players' representatives on an annual basis.
Spending 2010-2011
posted on 1/12/11
Mr Chelsea.
please stay on topic, wums will be deleted
posted on 1/12/11
TKOT
posted on 1/12/11
TKOT I deserve a ban for my little rant
posted on 1/12/11
Only tells you the total.
Not enough corresponding info for some basic stats.
For example, <Citeh> , though highest in total, could actually be paying the lowest agency margin per player (based on the wage bills) .
There also appears to be correlation between the total and clubs with "home grown" players (Arsenal, Man Utd etc) , and those buying in en masse.
posted on 1/12/11
RDBD
I report the facts Sir, I leave to those who understand such things to interpret them.
Off you go.
posted on 1/12/11
Nothing to understand. Just numbers. Insufficient data.
posted on 1/12/11
That's a load of nonsense. Agents pay Liverpool to take their players.
posted on 1/12/11
Everton so high?
Spurs so high?
posted on 2/12/11
It doesn't say how much arry got paid though, triffic bang that was in me sky rocket laaaaaavly.
posted on 2/12/11
Bang that wad in my sky rocket, bloody I phone!