I'm hearing all sorts of rumours abour Chelsea and M City doing a swap deal for their respective misfits.
They have a lot in common. Both betrayed the club that gave them a chance at the big-time in the Prem, jumping ship when they saw the pound signs flashing.
And both have lost a bit of form recently.
Is this a good deal for all concerned?
Torres vs Tevez
posted on 14/12/11
no one made this rumour , it was just a suggestion. Fail.
and secondly tevez didnt lose form he just didnt play. Ditto with torres as both eint playing.
Torrres had found some form before being dropped.
also no.
Torres > tevez
posted on 14/12/11
Well it would never happen so..
posted on 14/12/11
Yep, you're right. Tevez dumped West Ham
posted on 14/12/11
Tevez is better than Torres but not worth the effort. Very poor attitude and he'd be off in 12 months. Also there's been no rumours, just Chelsea fans making silly suggestions
posted on 14/12/11
Torres is better than tevez*
posted on 14/12/11
Tevez would do more bad than good. Maybe after Drogbas gone and Torres becomes the main man he might suddenly remember where the goal is!
posted on 14/12/11
Torres could never replace Tevez,Torres is Cack
posted on 14/12/11
Torres could never replace Tevez,Torres is Cack
---------------------------------------------------------
Torres would struggle to replace the invisible man? The highest of all insults
Stranger things have happened, but I don't see this swap deal. Don't need Torres anyway.
posted on 14/12/11
This has gone on for far too long now. The thought that we are still paying him makes me apoplectic. The way he has treated the club is beyond belief. He needs ending.
posted on 14/12/11
before i even clicked on your name i knew you were a united fan, how typical...