Why not?
Get rid of Arshavin and bring him in!
With a decent bit of man management, i think he could be a great addition.
Adel Taarabt?
posted on 20/6/11
Chicken, how about this link then:-
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/42405-arsenal-gunners-due-windfall-from-bentley-move
posted on 20/6/11
Or try this one :-
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-transfers/blackburn-rovers-transfers.html
Transfer fee received by Blackburn for sale of Bentley is shown as £7.5million - i.e. half of the £15million paid by Spurs - where do you think the other half went?.
posted on 20/6/11
Or maybe this one, from the Blackburn end, where the Arsenal 50% sell-on clause is freely acknowledged :-
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/9068623.Release_clause_in_Jones__contract/?action=complain&cid=9413307
So many reports, from so many different places, but all saying the same thing. Have they all made the whole thing up? Or was the sell-on clause one of the worst-kept bits of 'confidential' information in the history of mankind?
posted on 20/6/11
And they just keep coming Chicken :-
http://www.suite101.com/content/david-bentley-joins-tottenham-a63153
Couple of Spurs fans here who accept the sell-on clause existed :-
http://www.tottenhamblog.com/2011/05/26/for-sale-one-second-hand-bentley/
And this :-
http://www.adifferentleague.co.uk/default.aspx?Tab=1&Page=6&Article=244
posted on 21/6/11
MICE,
Mate, your clutching at straws. Them reports are so vague they make Nostradamus' predictions look miraculously spot on.
Nora Bone (or whatever he/she has changed their name to today) said they were in the Arsenal accounts.
I asked for a link.
And apparently there is no link.
I'm not denying there was a sell-on clause, but no-one in their right mind would accept a 50% one, hence all them links suggest the percentage is "around" X amount, because no-one actually knows.
posted on 21/6/11
"no-one in their right mind would accept a 50% one"
Oh really!
http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=soccer_league_1_and_2/11/06/04/manual_142629.html&BID=4
posted on 21/6/11
MICE,
As i said before, CLUTCHING!
posted on 21/6/11
How is it clutching? You make a statement that no-one would agree a 50% sell-on clause, & here is a Club Chairman admitting to theexistence of one.
Here's another:-
http://rminfo.blogspot.com/2008/04/summer-transfers.html
posted on 21/6/11
And here is a suggestion that Spurs had a 50% sell-on clause added when the flogged Taarabt to QPR :-
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/78460,sport,football,transfer-talk-michael-owen-gets-ready-for-life-at-derby-county-after-man-united-adel-taraabt-marouane-chamakh
posted on 22/6/11
MICE,
Again, you're going on speculation, a "suggestion", a "rumour", the fee is "around such & such".
I still haven't received a link to these accounts on arsenal.com.