since the rebirth of 606
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/6818
some classic comments:
'That is not true. Mr Ferguson's net spend at Man U has been skewed by the Ronaldo transfer, so you should not use that in the figures. Also, Rafa's does not include the £100m recouped by selling Torres, Mascherano, Babel, Benayoun etc etc.
When you factor these in, you can show that Rafa had a far lower spend than Mr Ferguson and Man U.'
'Rafa would have won the league easily if G&H hadn't sabotaged the club and Rafa's vision.'
'...made Liverpool the best side in Europe, winning us the ECL.'
'In that case you can look at how be increased the clubs value...When he left, they were valued at almost £1bn. An increase of 20 times! I would like to see any business show those financials! The facts are that Rafa has done wonders for the club, without taking any of the benefits. He deserves this testimonial.'
delusional.
the funniest article...
posted on 20/6/11
This comment had me in stitches.
...............................
comment by Liverpool Til I Die (U7865)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by oshealegend (U6806)
none of them left during rafa's reign - they can't by any strech of the imagination be included in his 'net spend'
----------------
In that case you can look at how be increased the clubs value. When he joined the club, they were valued at only £50m.
posted on 20/6/11
comment by Rooney 19 - ja606 is the future! (U1005) posted 2 minutes ago
'That is not true. Mr Ferguson's net spend at Man U has been skewed by the Ronaldo transfer, so you should not use that in the figures. '
That's genius
---------------------------
I always find it a bit weird too when people say it skews the figures
Surely in a net spend calculation, NOT including it would actually skew the figures.
posted on 20/6/11
Surely in a net spend calculation, NOT including it would actually skew the figures.
.................
You'd think so wouldn't you? But these are Scouse accountants we're dealing with.
posted on 20/6/11
You'd think so wouldn't you? But these are Scouse accountants we're dealing with.
============================================
rules of a liverpool transfer:
1. they always cost less than the papers/club accounts say
2. they're always paid peanuts
3. they'll come purely bc of rafa/liverpool/kenny d
4. they would be a success if they were given more time
5. they were sold for a profit
posted on 20/6/11
Don't forget they're all lifelong Liverpool fans and all have YAWN tattoos somewhere on them.
posted on 20/6/11
The funny thing is I actually think Liverpool Til I Die (U7865) is a WUM trying to make Liverpool fans look bad yet all of the Scousers are agreeing with him
posted on 20/6/11
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/6591/
the performance of bloodred here was quite something too
posted on 20/6/11
Here is another hilarious article by the same poster.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/6099/
I think Batmanu is right (did I just say that), he is pretending to be a Liverpool fan.
posted on 20/6/11
You won't be mocking come may when it dawns on all of us that it's just been liverpools year- and we didn't notice the upsurge in popularity for trakkies,traynees and a terry McDermott tash and perm as fashionable and iconic at the same time.
Wonder if anyones robbed hendersons house yet?
posted on 20/6/11
Skew you.