Views on Stadium Plans?

comment by honestlivpool_five_times (U1661) posted 3 seconds ago

Would LFC be happy to have a Sponsors name stadium?
=================================

If it leaves LFC better off, why not??

- - -

I suppose if you are leaving the area of the current stadium then losing the name Anfield is not such a big step.

For Spurs our stadium will be about 50M from the existing one (partially overlapping) so it not being called WHL will be hard to take (even though its not even on White Hart Lane).

Just hate the thought of it being the <Sponsors Name> Arena or Bowl or whatever...soulless.

So it's this ugly one with support cables (first generation AFL design):


http://aflarch.demonweb.co.uk/projects.php?action=showProject&catID=43&projectID=169

What's wrong with Sports Direct Arena?

http://aflarch.demonweb.co.uk/projects.php?action=showProject&catID=43&projectID=169

Its a bit generic modern stadium that one.

This one looked awesome!

http://www.stephenkeogh.com/New%20Kop.jpg

Maybe Anfield could still be part of the name.
Warriors Anfield

it won't be Anfield anymore

sell to the highest bidder and buy Messi

although I don't want a .com in the stadium name

Anfield Warriors

AnfieldWarriors.com

I googled worst company names

AmericInn Hotel

let's hope they can't come up with the cash

whilst the idea of a "wavy roof line" looks nice I really don't understand why they do that. Keep the roof lines STRAIGHT and you get MORE CAPACITY but less pleasing on the eye.
Maybe some technical reasons to do withy strength.