Prem without RVP'S goals

For all Arsenal fans sake, i would 8 2 see RVP get injured!

HERP DERP 'IF WE REMOVE THE BEST PLAYER FROM EACH TEAM, THEY'LL BE LESS GOOD SHOCKER'. Jesus, some of you must be stunned when the sun goes down every day.

HERP DERP 'IF WE REMOVE THE BEST PLAYER FROM EACH TEAM, THEY'LL BE LESS GOOD SHOCKER'. Jesus, some of you must be stunned when the sun goes down every day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

You still don't get it do you?

Yes, if you remove the best player from any team they will be weakened but most teams have players who will step up and fill the void left by their best player. Arsenal's do not have players who can step up and if Van Persie isn't on form.

Right..perhaps not to the level you think. But by simply going 'replace these goals with...nothing!' you're just being silly.

Right..perhaps not to the level you think. But by simply going 'replace these goals with...nothing!' you're just being silly.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Look at your other options ffs. Your other players aren't capable of scoring half the goals Van Persie does.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Scribe, it's only focused on Arsenal, for a bite!

This is easily the stupidest article on ja606 and i cant beliieve this guy hasnt been shot down and silenced yet.

http://www.soccerstatistically.com/blog/2011/11/9/how-to-succeed-in-the-epl-chances-created-and-chance-convers.html

This is all you need to give op. Chances created. Arsenal are 2nd behind man city. This clearly proves the fact that if rvp was missing the chances would still be being created at an exceptionally high volume


Scorers Team Goals Goal/shots
van Persie Arsenal 18 23%
Ba Newcastle 15 31%
Agüero Man City 14 24%
Rooney Man Utd 13 19%
Yakubu Blackburn 12 38%

Out of the top 5 goalscorers rvp is 2nd from bottom in clinicalness. Techinically if we had Ba we would be scoring a lot more goals.

We are not a one man team we simply have a system which is designed to direct our goalscoring chances to the man best suited to take them. Hence why chamakh scored so many in the first half of last season when rvp was out. Isnt this an efficient way of playing football dont you think op?

Now go to bed and stop writing nonsense

<"((((><

his is easily the stupidest article on ja606 and i cant beliieve this guy hasnt been shot down and silenced yet.

http://www.soccerstatistically.com/blog/2011/11/9/how-to-succeed-in-the-epl-chances-created-and-chance-convers.html

This is all you need to give op. Chances created. Arsenal are 2nd behind man city. This clearly proves the fact that if rvp was missing the chances would still be being created at an exceptionally high volume


Scorers Team Goals Goal/shots
van Persie Arsenal 18 23%
Ba Newcastle 15 31%
Agüero Man City 14 24%
Rooney Man Utd 13 19%
Yakubu Blackburn 12 38%

Out of the top 5 goalscorers rvp is 2nd from bottom in clinicalness. Techinically if we had Ba we would be scoring a lot more goals.

We are not a one man team we simply have a system which is designed to direct our goalscoring chances to the man best suited to take them. Hence why chamakh scored so many in the first half of last season when rvp was out. Isnt this an efficient way of playing football dont you think op?

Now go to bed and stop writing nonsense
------------------------------------------------------------------

But your other players can't score for $hit. Look at the chances they miss ffs.