Serious questions for the gers fans Would you rather still be under the control of lloyds or do you think the enigma that is whyte is the better of the two?
Correct me if iam wrong but did lloyds not actually spend money on players when they had a member on the board of rangers ???
Whereas craig whyte has had rangers dragged through courts over numerous serious and frivolous allegations, not too mention the blatant lies to the fans about the 15million front loaded warchest. And now to the non existant january transfer window when pieman is crying out for fresh blood whyte is nowhere to be seen.
So how could rangers spend money when lloyds had a member on board and where owed 17.5million give or take a few.
Now whyte bought gers for the price of a can of brew with all these promises he paid off lloyds so how can he still not buy players ????
I am really being serious when asking these questions as the way i see it under lloyds youse spent more money ??? yet all youse ever wanted was rid of them now it seems your worse off than before.
All you one star posters many thanks in advance
Serious Answers please if posssible :-)
posted on 27/1/12
LOdge meeting as i just phoned bear grylls he's at the hot plate wae at fur coat on, serving them up their succulent spam.
Says mcmoists been up for fourths already and neil murray is scouting for girls
posted on 27/1/12
THERES A GORILLA IN THE ROOM
posted on 27/1/12
King Kong
posted on 27/1/12
can anyone who has a better grasp of the english language than myself, please explain what my OP was supposed to ask the gers fans. Or any one that speaks moorish, orcish or peeeplish
WWW,HOWTOGETYOURPOINTACROSS.COM
posted on 27/1/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/1/12
haha ffs! :P
"serious question for the gers fans".... and then cue 27 comments from Celtic fans!
...can you cants no read!?
posted on 28/1/12
My honest answer is I would rather stick with Whyte if we lose the tax case, and would have rather stuck with Lloyds if we were to win. If we lost under Lloyds we would have been forced into asset stripping, however under Whyte we have the Pheonix club option.
posted on 28/1/12
Thanks for being the first bear to respond ecosse Pheonix ie as in new name for rangers, totally new company like when livingston took over meadowbank ??
Or more brian potter type pheonix
If as you say the pheonix option would you be happy with rangers losing all of their history ??? like third lanark and meadowbank ? As rangers as we know it would be no more ??
I don't think most gers fans would be happy with that scenario
posted on 28/1/12
If you look at the history of Leeds Utd you can see they started up a completely new company in 2007 - very interesting articles on this on both STV and the Scotsman newspapers. The difference with meadowbank and rangers is that we would not cease to exist in the way we did - our assets would just be transferred to a new holding company and with the exception of any SFA imposed actions and a 3 year ban from Europe, no-one would really notice the difference. We would still be Rangers, playing in Ibrox and just as Leeds still retain their history, we would still retain ours.
Is it right? Nope. Is it morally wrong? Yup. Can it be done? Yes it can. Am I happy about it? Not happy but at least there will still be a rangers.
posted on 29/1/12
It doesn't matter a jot if it's morally wrong if the law allows it to happen then theirs not f all anyone can do, The bit i dont understand is they keep going on about rangers losing their proud history, surely they would have read these articles you have read. Do you have any links for a quick perusal