Who would you prefer?
Saha for United was class, he was so good he kept RVN out of the team.
But all those injuries!!!
So do you think spurs signed the wrong french striker?
As far as im aware, Cisse aside from crazy mad leg breaks, doesnt have that bad an injury record.
Browse:
Saha vs Cisse
comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted on 1/2/12
saha is on loan though.
we are on a very tight budget and are planning for a new stadium so the loan option was more attractive to levy
i reckon you are paying cisse more than us saha too.
comment by elBarto (U9792)
posted on 1/2/12
to clarify im a united fan*
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 1/2/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by elBarto (U9792)
posted on 1/2/12
nope saha isnt on loan he signed on a free transfer:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16820538
comment by sea-the-stars//I'm back!!! (U7170)
posted on 1/2/12
The only plus side i can see to Saha is that he has been there and done it as regards to winning the title so that experience could be valuable.
comment by elBarto (U9792)
posted on 1/2/12
hmmm good point sea the stars. saha has been there done it and won it all pretty much.
i think cisse didnt fulfill his potential, obviously that leg and ankle break didnt help. very dangerous player though im not too sure of his haircuts
comment by Lucky Lips (U8767)
posted on 1/2/12
SAHA
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available