Ok I'll admit i just wanted to wind up the Arsenal fans today and I love the way they clutch at straws. When talking about Bale these are some of the gems they have come out with.
Ox is better than Bale
Adam Johnson is better than Bale
Valancia is better than Bale
Mata is better than Bale
Basically the player of the year last year and the only premiership player in UEFA team this year and yet he is just a decent winger but with many better than him in the premier league.............go over to the thread and have a chuckle.
Arsenal fans are so funny
posted on 2/2/12
TBAG,
Does it really matter what their preferred position
===================
When you're comiling a list of wingers, yes.
Do you even know the difference between a winger & a RM or LM?
posted on 2/2/12
Of course I do, but my point is just because Iniesta isn't an out and out winger, I'd rather put him in that position than Bale because I feel he'd do a better job.
It's not really hard to grasp.
posted on 2/2/12
TBAG
But if he's not a winger then how can he be put in a list of “better wingers”. I might think Andy Carroll would be better in goal than Szczesny, but it would be daft to put him in a list of goalkeepers better than Szczesny wouldnt it?
A winger doesn’t just need to be able to play in midfield, they generally need pace for starters, the ability to cross, dribble & trickery to beat players.
To be honest, your grasp of football knowledge does seem to be a tad low for a decent debate on this, so we’ll leave it there.
posted on 2/2/12
'To be honest, your grasp of football knowledge does seem to be a tad low for a decent debate on this, so we’ll leave it there.'
I was planning on ending on a similar note.
I get where you're coming from, but if Carroll is better in goal than Szczesny then he's a better keeper, regardless of whether or not he gets played upfront because he's the best upfront.
I'm just trying to say each position isn't mutually exclusive, I play at a half decent standard on Saturdays in CM. I then play pub football on Sundays and I'll often play as a full back, and just because I'd better in the middle, doesn't mean I'm not better than all the other dross full backs in the league. It's possible to be better in all positions is all I'm saying.
Anyway this has wondered into a pretty silly grey area that doesn't even have much to do with football.
posted on 2/2/12
I'm just trying to say each position isn't mutually exclusive, I play at a half decent standard on Saturdays in CM. I then play pub football on Sundays and I'll often play as a full back
==========================
posted on 2/2/12
I don't get what's about that?
I don't care about the team, I'm hungover as sin and just do a favour for mates.
posted on 3/2/12
The ..was for you putting your tin pot Sunday league in the same bracket as professional football.
posted on 3/2/12
I'm not comparing the two, I'm just trying to think of a relevant example without moving outside of football.
You might be best at English in school, and my best subject could be Maths, but that wouldn't stop me still being better than you at English too.
-waits to be accused of still going to school-
posted on 3/2/12
TBAG
You might be best at English in school, and my best subject could be Maths, but that wouldn't stop me still being better than you at English too.
=======================
But if you've never seen me study English, how could anyone say i am better at English than you? Because that is basically what you are saying. You listed player who you reckon are better wingers than Bale, when neither you, or anyone else, has ever seen them play there. So how can they appear in a list of "better wingers"?
Its like saying Messi isnt the best in the world because Bruce Forsyth could be better, so lets put him & Terry Wogan as the best 2, maybe throw in Graham Norton as well, as he once played for the school?
Is just the most ridiculous comparisons ever.
posted on 3/2/12
I know what you mean.
I think I've seen the majority play as wingers, but I can't even remember my exact list now