Australia at the time I write this Article are 207/4 after 39.2 overs, having recovered from 81/3 with the help of 98 runs partnership for the 4th wicket between David Hussey and Forrest.Praiseworthy aspect about the partnership was the rate at which they scored runs, 5.54.It has put India on the back foot and with their batsmen not been in ideal form, winning from here is an arduous task.
Browse:
Yet another defeat?
comment by Warmonger (U10140)
posted on 12/2/12
Apparently, I am the only useless person at ja606.
Indian bowlers have done well and restricted Aussies to 265/7 after 49.2. They have bowled exceptionally well in the late over and despite Australia had wickets in hand, they could not charge in the late overs.
Indian bowling in ODI's look good.Their selectors should contemplate over replacing Ishant in test matches because they do not have bad reserves in fast bowling area.
comment by (U6361)
posted on 12/2/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Warmonger (U10140)
posted on 12/2/12
Neon u are happy to learn that u are not alone in that category.
comment by Warmonger (U10140)
posted on 12/2/12
Sehwag and Gambhir off toa flier.Pitch is great for batting and I expect this to be a fascinating contest.
Wakeup Guys! I expect India to win without their god.
comment by hopeforthebest (U3251)
posted on 12/2/12
That LBW decision against Gambhir was Atrocious. Any right arm over delivery that is pitch short of a length must have pitched outside leg unless it has moved in toward the stumps. That delivery was straight. Can never be out unless it is well pitched up.
comment by GLAD I'M NOT A GUJI (U12968)
posted on 12/2/12
OMG GAME OVER
comment by Maksi. (U12624)
posted on 12/2/12
Well done to India for winning this particular battle of the losers
posted on 12/2/12
unfortunately maksi, if england fail to win a single game of what you call the battle of losers, then they will have an egg in their scoreline
comment by Maksi. (U12624)
posted on 12/2/12
This thread is not about England?
comment by (U6361)
posted on 12/2/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available