Let's watch some goals

Oh for a Dean Saunders, Paul Goddard and Nigel Callaghan now.

comment by 666 - Irresistibly So (U11795)


posted 1 day, 3 hours ago

Now who said that Nathan Tyson was a striker? Oh yes, it was Tom Glick

I think you'll find that was, and is, Nigel Clough

Tom Glick is responsible for many, many things but selecting players and determining their position is NOT one of them, that's down to Junior.
__________________________________________

Well 666, when Tom Glick was asked the question about the experienced striker, this is Glicks answer "we still have Tyson to come back fro injury, he's the striker we have brought in to score the goals" But you know me I check all his interviews out cause he contradicts himself alot (surprise surprise) After we had brought Tyson in last summer, he said we still need to bring an experienced striker in!! Same old spin! FACT

Perhaps so, but who do you suppose told him Tyson was a striker..? Who identified him as a striker we should buy..? We all accept, and Glick does not claim otherwise, that he knows very little about the sport, muchless individual players, so the "Tyson is a striker" can only have come from one place!

Clough OUT!

Have you got proof in that or is it just a theory?

Put it this way then, Wassa.. if Glick ISN'T listening to Clough on who plays where and who to sign, then clearly all confidence is lost in his manager, and so.....

Clough OUT!!

Proof/theory

666's political views > 666's DCFC views

vidal's MiLFy views > vidals DCFC views

MiLFY OUT!!

MILFs football views > vidals political views > 666s football views

MILF in

666s all-knowing knowingness > MILFs football views > vidals political views < a goldfish's attention span.