Looking from the outside, i see the administrators have claimed laying off too many players will put off potential buyers.
Surely less players would mean less wages, meaning buyers would actually be more keen! None of these players have much significant value anyway, you sold your most valuable player in January. No-one's going to want to buy players like Gregg Wilde, so it's best to get as many of them out as possible.
If the wage bill was reduced sufficiently, that would be a good chance for a buyer to come in, get the club on the cheap without massive expenditure and re-build the club.
The administrators are supposed to find ways to balance the books, clearly they're not doing this. So what are they doing?
The administrators are telling lies!
posted on 7/3/12
I have never seen Administrators like it at any other club.
posted on 7/3/12
By god you're right! Why hasn't anyone else noticed this blatant skullduggery?
Any buy of Rangers which has no notable first team players would then need to invest, what, £10m? £15m? to replace to the standard the team is currently at?
Doesn't seem attractive to me?
posted on 7/3/12
Any buy of Rangers which has no notable first team players would then need to invest, what, £10m? £15m? to replace to the standard the team is currently at?
+++++++
So would think those figures provide Ally with a team that should be capable of beating all othe Spl teams ouwtih Celtic?
There's the 'Tainted Title' theory smashed
posted on 7/3/12
"So would think those figures provide Ally with a team...."
Don't know about theories being smashed... but you appear to be.
Either that or you're just as thick as mince.
Oh... wait.
Thumbs
posted on 7/3/12
This is one of those 50-50 things that clever people talk about. Should we raise tax to deal with our debts or cut tax so that the economy will grow. Who knows? Personally I would want a smaller wage bill.