I am with the supporters of smaller clubs on this one, why do Celtic and Rangers have the most TV money?
Whilst I do not dispute that it is our games that get us a TV contract in the first place. But even if we did split the TV money equally, I don't think we would be threatened by the likes of Hearts, Hibs, Dundee United and Aberdeen. But surely if the money was split equally then it would be better for our league.
Celtic and Rangers will always have a financial advantage anyway, due to the gate money both clubs receive.
Change the voting structure, make the league bigger and more interesting.
The Share of TV Money?
posted on 14/3/12
Ban TV and be done with this silly argument. The OF have an unfair advantage due to getting more tv money and more exposure. 27 years since a team outwith the OF won the league! Yes, we have larger supports, but that doesn't give us a divine right to more tv money. The SPL needs a Hearts or a Dundee Utd to win the league. It would invigorate Scottish football. Change the voting structure as it benefits no one other than the OF. This self interest has damaged Scottish football.
posted on 14/3/12
comment by Polbethian 0isthenumberpreceding1 (U4211)
posted 2 minutes ago
duke i agree with the other teams. the old firm taking a bit of a hit to allow the other clubs to flourish a little can only be good for the league. we're always moaning we're sick of the dross
=====
Perhaps mmmm though Im not sure
This 2 million we would give away
That is perhaps 2 or 3 class players
Now that would have little impact on our SPL challenge but are we willing to drop even further down the euro ranking
Those 2 or 3 players could be a big loss at this level
posted on 14/3/12
FFS! Yer no wantin the Gers tae take anither hit
Relentless basterts
posted on 14/3/12
Quebec I was 9 to 18 during 9 in a row and didn't know much better. I do know now that the lack of competition in the SPL with only either half winning the title will slowly but surely kill Scottish football.
It's now 27 years since a non-OF team won the league and at this rate it will be another 27 without them winning the league.
posted on 14/3/12
Interesting responses guys, an issue we can all debate without tinted spectacles, I suppose.
We need radical changes. We have a league where the team in eighth could have more points than the team in fifth. Where two clubs will dominate for the eternity of Scottish Football and most clubs' main objective is survival.
We seriously need to look at pricing and placing our younger players on well thought out contracts, you know contracts with clauses that prevent Npower Championship teams stealing players for rock bottom prices; where what they pay for the player will be a tenth of what they are worth almost overnight.
posted on 14/3/12
Money or no money...the best players will always want to play for the OF
It was 20 odd years of OF dominance before Aberdeen won it in the 80's
posted on 14/3/12
posted on 14/3/12
play offs are great we should have them
The split I feel is good particularly in a 2 horse race
Imagine without and one had Dunf and Hibs the other Hearts and Motherwell in the last games
The only alternative is add 6 teams... can we do that??
posted on 14/3/12
The New Firm revolution came about in a different era and at a time when both clubs had special managers. If I remember rightly Dundee United used only 13 players the year they won the league.
The greatest times for Scottish Football in Europe has been when our league was at it's most competitive. It surely cannot be any coincidence.
posted on 14/3/12
The greatest times for Scottish Football in Europe has been when our league was at it's most competitive. It surely cannot be any coincidence
++++
And before all the BIG leagues were bringing in ALL the best players.That'll no come back, unless Uefa change their system which suits the big boys.
We have 70 Scottish players playing in the Championship and Division 1 alone