IF WE BEAT SUNDERLAND................

Nah, that's more Southern than wool tbf.

Anyway, got over your mood mate?

& no I didn't read the deleted post - miss anything enlightening?

Hardly enlighting.

I just thought it may have helped you to understand my point re tactical switch,you couldn`t seem to get it.

Southern ?
Derek ?

I did 'get it', it just made no sense, there's a difference

Nah, you didn`t understand my point at all,mate.

My point was if you needed a goal to win a cup tie why would you sit Tim in front of the back four?
You came back with "it was only for 10 minutes"....what difference does how long he sat him in front of the back four make ?

You then came back with "to go with 3 in midfield would have lost our width...where did i mention "going with 3 in midfield"?

It`s a simple question...you need a goal to win a cup tie,who is more likely to get you a goal?
Cahill or Fellaini ?

And before you say it ,i know Tim has scored less than previous seasons,but i thought he looked bang at it on Saturday.

Sorry Concerned. You are narrowing our potential goalscorers to Cahill or Fellaini.

I used to admire your earlier postings on this site but, now i see your constant bickering with other Blues and the Juvenile exchanges that have taken place recently, allied to the most unfortunate predilections that have emanated from your keyboard, i have nothing to say other than you have demonstrated yourself to be nothing more than an absolute, juvenile and foul- mouthed pillock.
God knows what other Teams followers make of the absolute trash that you choose to supply on this site, supposedly in the name of true Evertonians.
Please desist in the name of commonsense.

CE - I thought we looked more dangerous with Fellaini in that position tbh as he was playing alongside Jelavic, whereas imo Tim had been dropping too far off him in open play.

Moyes decided to alter it & instead of bringing on Stracq earlier (either for Cahill or AN other in midfield) he mixed it up a bit & put Fellaini there. You were suggesting that it was a negative tactic which it wasn't.

SILKY - do you sit in the Top Balcony mate?

If not negative,it was certainly not as positive as leaving Cahill playing as a centre forward,right alongside Jelavic.

Do you consider Cahill decided to remove himself from playing alongside Jelavic,and drop deeper,or was he under instruction.

TB,where did i suggest it was a negative tactic.

Silky,

A marvellous oratory contribution.
You didn`t learn that in the Blood Tub

No, Silly!!!! The Glass Barrel in Market street.

That`s like a toff`s pub compared to the Blood Tub.

Some good days in there a good few years ago.
I still bear the lumps