Dwayne Leverock would get a 10 wicket match haul against England
Pidier. Most people on the old 606 didnt pay attention to rankings when India were top. Why do they now?
.....Just in case the page turned to quickly and some missed it........
.comment by Neon - and on, and on, and on (U6361)
posted 3 minutes ago
Dern - I'll level with you..
Rabbitoe and myself do wum England a bit.....and you get wound up. Which just makes our efforts worthwhile.
Now, I dont tend to say much to:
2074 - Sprinler bloke
Hazsa
Kash
Rabbitoe
and a few others
Why?? They dont react much, and just give it back when India play and lose (which is getting to be "normal" now)
I dont accuse them of ruining threads
Dont have a tantrum
Just take it..and dish it out......Thats all its about
When India beat Pakistan, I coudent wait to throw some commenst back at Kash..and Im sure it would have been vice-versa, if India lost.
if we just dicussed cricket..and dident have much banter. This place woudl be boring
eg. I bet you cant wait to beat Australia in the ashes...to shove those "chest-beating" comments down Rabbit's neck???
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Rabbit you're an honest fella. what's worse losing to SL away or NZ at home.
By the way Pidier, if England fail to win in Colombo they lose the number one spot.
No.1.........do you mean to say this team that got flogged by Sri-Lanka are No.1.....my lord...
If I was a pummie I'd make the running olympic squad....
You wouldnt get a visa pal
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
they`ve got pictures of him up at airports...
Mug shots
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I`v seen many many mug shots this week....
They call it the sweep
Rabbit, you do know Australia are in the middle of a series themselves right? You don't seem too bothered about that...
australia won 1-0 in srilanka. its nothing different. same teams and same australia. now england will not be able to win this.
also england are on the right track to break india's record of 8-0 overseas. come on england 4-0 down another 5-0 needs to be achieved
Yes, Viru, you are correct, but your record is still going, so is ours, it's like we are having a race.
Viru, SL had Dilshan as captain at the time, who was uninspiring to say the least.
i think you could see dilshan was bit unlucky. he was the only one that was performing. mahela at that time didnt even score a 50 if my memory serves right. so i guess it was an internal issue and hence no one wanted to perform when dilshan was cpataining.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
lool just true. hmm we r not playing overseas for another 2 years if im right. so I hope we have a fresh india that is hungry to change india's fortunes.
Viru SL weren't getting paid at the time either. And I think this was when Samaraweera had been dropped. Not sure though...
gg yh i guess no team would perform if you are not getting paid.
Most people on the old 606 didnt pay attention to rankings when India were top. Why do they now?
===========
This is just total bs, were you even on the old 606? No one talked about the rankings before 2008 because it was obvious who the best team in the world was, everyone has been talking about them since because every 3-5 series we see it becomes apparent that one team "deserves" the top ranking.
Just to burst your bubble, all people did in the last few years of old 606 was talk about how undeserving of the No.1 spot India were.
Also, those who think Australia had an easier time against Sri Lanka, I think it's time to put your big boy pants on.
Also, those who think Australia had an easier time against Sri Lanka, I think it's time to put your big boy pants on.
-----
Well they did...
But I don't think it would have made much of a difference to the result in that series. Aussies were superb
Sign in if you want to comment
ENGLAND
Page 2 of 3
posted on 29/3/12
Kenya
posted on 29/3/12
Dwayne Leverock would get a 10 wicket match haul against England
posted on 29/3/12
Pidier. Most people on the old 606 didnt pay attention to rankings when India were top. Why do they now?
posted on 29/3/12
.....Just in case the page turned to quickly and some missed it........
.comment by Neon - and on, and on, and on (U6361)
posted 3 minutes ago
Dern - I'll level with you..
Rabbitoe and myself do wum England a bit.....and you get wound up. Which just makes our efforts worthwhile.
Now, I dont tend to say much to:
2074 - Sprinler bloke
Hazsa
Kash
Rabbitoe
and a few others
Why?? They dont react much, and just give it back when India play and lose (which is getting to be "normal" now)
I dont accuse them of ruining threads
Dont have a tantrum
Just take it..and dish it out......Thats all its about
When India beat Pakistan, I coudent wait to throw some commenst back at Kash..and Im sure it would have been vice-versa, if India lost.
if we just dicussed cricket..and dident have much banter. This place woudl be boring
eg. I bet you cant wait to beat Australia in the ashes...to shove those "chest-beating" comments down Rabbit's neck???
posted on 29/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 29/3/12
Rabbit you're an honest fella. what's worse losing to SL away or NZ at home.
By the way Pidier, if England fail to win in Colombo they lose the number one spot.
posted on 29/3/12
Who is number one guys?
posted on 29/3/12
Kenya
posted on 29/3/12
No.1.........do you mean to say this team that got flogged by Sri-Lanka are No.1.....my lord...
If I was a pummie I'd make the running olympic squad....
posted on 29/3/12
You wouldnt get a visa pal
posted on 29/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 29/3/12
they`ve got pictures of him up at airports...
Mug shots
posted on 29/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 29/3/12
I`v seen many many mug shots this week....
They call it the sweep
posted on 29/3/12
Rabbit, you do know Australia are in the middle of a series themselves right? You don't seem too bothered about that...
posted on 29/3/12
australia won 1-0 in srilanka. its nothing different. same teams and same australia. now england will not be able to win this.
also england are on the right track to break india's record of 8-0 overseas. come on england 4-0 down another 5-0 needs to be achieved
posted on 29/3/12
Yes, Viru, you are correct, but your record is still going, so is ours, it's like we are having a race.
posted on 29/3/12
Viru, SL had Dilshan as captain at the time, who was uninspiring to say the least.
posted on 29/3/12
i think you could see dilshan was bit unlucky. he was the only one that was performing. mahela at that time didnt even score a 50 if my memory serves right. so i guess it was an internal issue and hence no one wanted to perform when dilshan was cpataining.
posted on 29/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 29/3/12
lool just true. hmm we r not playing overseas for another 2 years if im right. so I hope we have a fresh india that is hungry to change india's fortunes.
posted on 29/3/12
Viru SL weren't getting paid at the time either. And I think this was when Samaraweera had been dropped. Not sure though...
posted on 29/3/12
gg yh i guess no team would perform if you are not getting paid.
posted on 29/3/12
Most people on the old 606 didnt pay attention to rankings when India were top. Why do they now?
===========
This is just total bs, were you even on the old 606? No one talked about the rankings before 2008 because it was obvious who the best team in the world was, everyone has been talking about them since because every 3-5 series we see it becomes apparent that one team "deserves" the top ranking.
Just to burst your bubble, all people did in the last few years of old 606 was talk about how undeserving of the No.1 spot India were.
Also, those who think Australia had an easier time against Sri Lanka, I think it's time to put your big boy pants on.
posted on 29/3/12
Also, those who think Australia had an easier time against Sri Lanka, I think it's time to put your big boy pants on.
-----
Well they did...
But I don't think it would have made much of a difference to the result in that series. Aussies were superb
Page 2 of 3