Logic would suggest that each contract is different thus allowing for the resignation mentioned.
I doubt its a standard thing, I don't think there is a MS Word document flying around where they simple change the name of the contracted person
True but you haven't fully understood the article, I am fully aware that contracts are different.
So what you suggest is that the Blues have allowed this to happen by not securing Dai on a more restrictive contract? Therefore they have been pretty niave and should know better?
Therefore they have no legal case to argue, but they are arguing so there must be something more to it.
Wasps/Blues legal battle
Page 1 of 1
posted on 6/7/11
Logic would suggest that each contract is different thus allowing for the resignation mentioned.
I doubt its a standard thing, I don't think there is a MS Word document flying around where they simple change the name of the contracted person
posted on 8/7/11
True but you haven't fully understood the article, I am fully aware that contracts are different.
So what you suggest is that the Blues have allowed this to happen by not securing Dai on a more restrictive contract? Therefore they have been pretty niave and should know better?
Therefore they have no legal case to argue, but they are arguing so there must be something more to it.
posted on 12/7/11
Sky Sports have cancelled all rugby games this year
Page 1 of 1