Why appoint a director of football if you don't know who the best manager is - they might not get along historically or may not sing from the same song sheet? And why does anyone care who our director of communications is? Hardly a position to provoke mass debate previously.
On the stadium I would rather have a plan for something that is affordable rather than start something that will run millions over budget.
The whole point of a DOF is he's the top dog, you don't let the manager tell the DOF what to do. The DOF should be first if you want that arrangement.
On the stadium, we have no plan.
It's taking a long time due to the club preseason tour of America.
They have to get someone who isn't on the no fly list
The DOF may be the top job but the right manager is possibly the harder if the two to get so why appoint someone that might clash - its a balancing act but I'd get them either at the same time or the manager first.
The stadium is harder to justify but seriously if the other options aren't viable why go for them for the sake of it? Every year without a bigger capacity is an opportunity lost but rather that than a white elephant that can't be finished.
As for the pre season tour and no fly list does that mean we can't have Joey Barton as player manager?
Why appoint a director of football if you don't know who the best manager is
........................
Why appoint a director of football at all?
I'm inclined to agree with you Vidischin but it seems to be the way the club want to do it
opposition fans think managers not wanting to attend an interview = turning down the actual managerial job
No manager has or will be offered a job until all interviews are sorted and everyone is happy with the chosen candidate end of....
just because they are invited to have an interview doesnt mean they have been offered the job, infact their odds of actually getting the job at the end of it are slim.
No1 knows what FSG are after really.
opposition fans think managers not wanting to attend an interview = turning down the actual managerial job
....................................
Not sure how you can even spin it to mean anything different.
If you turn down the interview, you are turning down the job.
just because they are invited to have an interview doesnt mean they have been offered the job
.......................................
Do you think they are being interviewed for a kit washing vacancy, or the tea lady position?
If someone asked me to attend an interview to be a Brain Surgeon when actually I have a degree in Sports Science and I said no it'd mean I turned the interview down because I knew they'd be no chance of progressing - just a thought
Har0ldinho89
Don't take offence here, but do you know how the job interview process works?
a job and an interview are 2 seperate things
so basically you are saying if you go to an interview you get the job?
no you dont lol
so how does turning down an interview = turning down a job? comon mate.
in a sense you are turning down the possibility of a job that is all....
if an interview was a job id of had 100s of jobs by now.
comment by Har0ldinho89 (U5667)
posted 4 minutes ago
in a sense you are turning down the possibility of a job that is all
......................
Exactly, so us opposition fans thinking that turning down an interview = they are turning down the job.
I am glad you now comprehend this.
Have the club actually confirmed that these people are all declining an opportunity or is this the press going after EVERY manager who fits the "young" criteria and just asking them outright if they want to be interviewed for the liverpool job? me thinks its the latter because the very fact that the bookies are changing the odds on our next manager by the hour means that nobody outside of the club has a scooby who is actually in the frame bar martinez. The only reason that is in the public domain is because whelan blurted it out and is obviously keen to get some compensation off liverpool. The rest of the stories are pure guesswork and the "declines" are nothing more than answers to tabloid questions
As I say above perhaps managers turn down interviews as they either know they won't get the job or don't feel they have the skillset to do the job as well as others?
pray4superinjunction, they dont even know what skillset is required until they have an interview and ask questions lol.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Due diligence
Page 1 of 1
posted on 21/5/12
Why appoint a director of football if you don't know who the best manager is - they might not get along historically or may not sing from the same song sheet? And why does anyone care who our director of communications is? Hardly a position to provoke mass debate previously.
On the stadium I would rather have a plan for something that is affordable rather than start something that will run millions over budget.
The whole point of a DOF is he's the top dog, you don't let the manager tell the DOF what to do. The DOF should be first if you want that arrangement.
On the stadium, we have no plan.
posted on 21/5/12
It's taking a long time due to the club preseason tour of America.
They have to get someone who isn't on the no fly list
posted on 21/5/12
The DOF may be the top job but the right manager is possibly the harder if the two to get so why appoint someone that might clash - its a balancing act but I'd get them either at the same time or the manager first.
The stadium is harder to justify but seriously if the other options aren't viable why go for them for the sake of it? Every year without a bigger capacity is an opportunity lost but rather that than a white elephant that can't be finished.
As for the pre season tour and no fly list does that mean we can't have Joey Barton as player manager?
posted on 21/5/12
Why appoint a director of football if you don't know who the best manager is
........................
Why appoint a director of football at all?
posted on 21/5/12
I'm inclined to agree with you Vidischin but it seems to be the way the club want to do it
posted on 21/5/12
opposition fans think managers not wanting to attend an interview = turning down the actual managerial job
No manager has or will be offered a job until all interviews are sorted and everyone is happy with the chosen candidate end of....
posted on 21/5/12
just because they are invited to have an interview doesnt mean they have been offered the job, infact their odds of actually getting the job at the end of it are slim.
No1 knows what FSG are after really.
posted on 21/5/12
opposition fans think managers not wanting to attend an interview = turning down the actual managerial job
....................................
Not sure how you can even spin it to mean anything different.
If you turn down the interview, you are turning down the job.
posted on 21/5/12
just because they are invited to have an interview doesnt mean they have been offered the job
.......................................
Do you think they are being interviewed for a kit washing vacancy, or the tea lady position?
posted on 21/5/12
If someone asked me to attend an interview to be a Brain Surgeon when actually I have a degree in Sports Science and I said no it'd mean I turned the interview down because I knew they'd be no chance of progressing - just a thought
posted on 21/5/12
Har0ldinho89
Don't take offence here, but do you know how the job interview process works?
posted on 21/5/12
a job and an interview are 2 seperate things
so basically you are saying if you go to an interview you get the job?
no you dont lol
so how does turning down an interview = turning down a job? comon mate.
posted on 21/5/12
in a sense you are turning down the possibility of a job that is all....
posted on 21/5/12
if an interview was a job id of had 100s of jobs by now.
posted on 21/5/12
comment by Har0ldinho89 (U5667)
posted 4 minutes ago
in a sense you are turning down the possibility of a job that is all
......................
Exactly, so us opposition fans thinking that turning down an interview = they are turning down the job.
I am glad you now comprehend this.
posted on 21/5/12
Have the club actually confirmed that these people are all declining an opportunity or is this the press going after EVERY manager who fits the "young" criteria and just asking them outright if they want to be interviewed for the liverpool job? me thinks its the latter because the very fact that the bookies are changing the odds on our next manager by the hour means that nobody outside of the club has a scooby who is actually in the frame bar martinez. The only reason that is in the public domain is because whelan blurted it out and is obviously keen to get some compensation off liverpool. The rest of the stories are pure guesswork and the "declines" are nothing more than answers to tabloid questions
posted on 21/5/12
As I say above perhaps managers turn down interviews as they either know they won't get the job or don't feel they have the skillset to do the job as well as others?
posted on 23/5/12
pray4superinjunction, they dont even know what skillset is required until they have an interview and ask questions lol.
Page 1 of 1