Who cares, he is not a a creative midfielder either.
comment by Hello My Name Is Vermaelen (U3896)
posted 4 seconds ago
Who cares, he is not a a creative midfielder either.
yes he is
Really isn't, a finisher not a creator.
He can't cross. Of course he isn't creative.
comment by andre's samba scarf (U6253)
posted 4 seconds ago
He can't cross. Of course he isn't creative.
he is creative, he makes chances and usually through the middle
Serious question.
Is he going to play better than Rosicky next season?
I thought Tomas was superb at the end of the year, showing great touches, turns and passes. He has rediscovered his pace and he was crucial in our revival, bossing the midfield against Spurs.
If Kagawa had come in January and played anything like that we'd be going on about how "world class" he was.
truthfully I did not know him until we where linked with him....
he can choose a number of clubs to play for. Sadly we are low on his list
He would have gone to United anyway even if we were linked with him
I don't think there was ever a dount that he had his heart set on a move to United unfortunately. Would have loved him at Arsenal.
Don't worry, you're still getting Anderson.
Who cares, he is not a a creative midfielder either.
HMNV: please give up on this. Some will never understand that he isnt a creative midfielder
By the way he will cost United 15M +.
Where would Kagawa play at Arsenal? Would he replace Arteta, Song, Wilshere or Podowlski? Arsenal need players who strengthen key areas, and Kagawa is not one of them. Better to sign M'villa because of his defensive qualities.
Don't worry, you're still getting Anderson.
----
Nice one Ruiney. That's like saying that instead of winning the lottery, you've actually contracted a horrific std.
The return of the king (U14567)
we have already got to many midfielders.
We don't really need him at Arsenal. He would just be an upgraded Rosicky. We have other priorities.
I'll be happier if we land M'Vila than if we had signed Kagawa. Far too many games like 3-3 vs Norwich. We created plenty, spurned loads of chances but gave the ball away SO much. A Gilberto player is what we need.
He would have been a terrific signing for us but it's no surprise that we missed out on him, we are a joke in the transfer market.
He was always going to go to Man United anyway.
He's not a creative midfielder, yes. But would still be a good player to have around.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Kagawa!!!!
Page 1 of 1
posted on 5/6/12
We couldn't afford him.
posted on 5/6/12
Who cares, he is not a a creative midfielder either.
posted on 5/6/12
comment by Hello My Name Is Vermaelen (U3896)
posted 4 seconds ago
Who cares, he is not a a creative midfielder either.
yes he is
posted on 5/6/12
Really isn't, a finisher not a creator.
posted on 5/6/12
He can't cross. Of course he isn't creative.
posted on 5/6/12
comment by andre's samba scarf (U6253)
posted 4 seconds ago
He can't cross. Of course he isn't creative.
he is creative, he makes chances and usually through the middle
posted on 5/6/12
Serious question.
Is he going to play better than Rosicky next season?
I thought Tomas was superb at the end of the year, showing great touches, turns and passes. He has rediscovered his pace and he was crucial in our revival, bossing the midfield against Spurs.
If Kagawa had come in January and played anything like that we'd be going on about how "world class" he was.
posted on 5/6/12
truthfully I did not know him until we where linked with him....
posted on 5/6/12
he can choose a number of clubs to play for. Sadly we are low on his list
posted on 5/6/12
He would have gone to United anyway even if we were linked with him
posted on 5/6/12
I don't think there was ever a dount that he had his heart set on a move to United unfortunately. Would have loved him at Arsenal.
posted on 5/6/12
Don't worry, you're still getting Anderson.
posted on 5/6/12
Who cares, he is not a a creative midfielder either.
HMNV: please give up on this. Some will never understand that he isnt a creative midfielder
posted on 5/6/12
By the way he will cost United 15M +.
posted on 5/6/12
Where would Kagawa play at Arsenal? Would he replace Arteta, Song, Wilshere or Podowlski? Arsenal need players who strengthen key areas, and Kagawa is not one of them. Better to sign M'villa because of his defensive qualities.
posted on 5/6/12
Don't worry, you're still getting Anderson.
----
Nice one Ruiney. That's like saying that instead of winning the lottery, you've actually contracted a horrific std.
posted on 5/6/12
The return of the king (U14567)
we have already got to many midfielders.
posted on 5/6/12
We don't really need him at Arsenal. He would just be an upgraded Rosicky. We have other priorities.
posted on 5/6/12
I'll be happier if we land M'Vila than if we had signed Kagawa. Far too many games like 3-3 vs Norwich. We created plenty, spurned loads of chances but gave the ball away SO much. A Gilberto player is what we need.
posted on 5/6/12
He would have been a terrific signing for us but it's no surprise that we missed out on him, we are a joke in the transfer market.
posted on 5/6/12
He was always going to go to Man United anyway.
posted on 5/6/12
He's not a creative midfielder, yes. But would still be a good player to have around.
Page 1 of 1