Don't need a CM, we need a RW.
Torres
Hazard - Mata - Ramires
Mikel - Modric
is better than
Torres
Hazard - Mata - Hulk
Mikel - Ramires
Or Hulk + Modric at 65.
Not a bad deal.
In terms of value for money, maybe Modric. Watching him for Spurs and the amount of attacks he starts and keeps flowingfrom midfield is something we desperately need at Chelsea. Lampard did a decent job there at the end of the season, but Modric will do it a lot better.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Lampard did a decent job there at the end of the season, but Modric will do it a lot better.
===============
Disagree. Lampard gave him the run-around in the FA cup.
Lampard actually played quite poorly till his super goal against Spurs in the FA cup semi. I feel Hulk could make us very potent but at that price, I think Modric might be better value. As someone above said, Ramires at right wing with Modric behind is slightly better than Ramires deep and Hulk further forward on the right wing.
Lampard actually played quite poorly till his super goal against Spurs in the FA cup semi.
==================
Perhaps but Modric was in no way better
And we need Hulk. We'll become too lightweight without a player like him - direct and strong.
Look at
City - Yaya
Madrid - Ronaldo
Hulk all the way, i don't care how much he costs we need him . Need em both really though
TBH i dont want to push the price of Modric up and hopes he goes somewhere for less than £25million, just so we can say we offered you £30+million last year but took the p1$$ and didnt take it!
Value for money- Modric
Who do we need more- Hulk
MODRIC!!!
Ridiculous how people believe we don't need a CM.
Ridiculous how people believe we don't need a CM.
----------
You know, a good few games doesn't make Mikel a star all of a sudden. As i've said before he excels in games where we need to defend, but when we need to attack he is not the man. We need modric, offers us even more options and systems
Hulk is strong but does go to ground a bit too easily. But i do think we need him more than Modric though his cost is quite honestly a rip-off.
But my opinion on the original post is choose Modric at that price and stick with Rami on the right.
Hulk will shift several times more shirts than Modric will. Also he provides some physical strength to our attack which we seriously lack with Drogba gone.
As a deep lying play-maker? Modric is defintely better then Lampard there, Lampard may have had a few good games at the end of the season, but I very much doubt he will keep that up for next season.
Like I said, watching Spurs play a lot, it is quite brilliant watching Modric keeping attacks flowing and starting them off as well. We should definitely be looking to get a player like that in our team. Lampard at 33/34 is not going to do it for a whole season.
We need a CM or a CF more than we need a RW
Who is gunna play RW then TBK? Your favourite boy Sturridge? The guy is absoulete cack and we'll get destroyed once again next season. We need Hulk or someone else as RW. And we have 2 cfs in Torres and Lukaku
Marin or Sturridge. You say that but if he can re-create his RW form he'll easily fit in, Lukaku's going on loan and I'm surpirsed people are willing to trust on just Torres and Sturridge as our CF for the whole of next season - neither have shown they can be consistent in scoring goals for a full season at Chelsea, or be that man ib a big game to carry the team.
*RW form for the first half of the season he'll fit in
Although I have not seen much of Hulk I like the idea of signing a forward that can play out wide or down the middle, that makes a lot of sense to me and I would argue we need that type of player more than we do Modric now.
He is worse as a CF thuogh, that's my problem
We need a RW, Sturridge can't be trusted.
Hulk as a RW > Sturridge as a RW
Hulk as a CF > Sturridge as a CF
Hulk at defending > Sturridge at defending
Best solution - Sell Sturridge and Buy Hulk
Sign in if you want to comment
Hulk at 38 or Modric at 27?
Page 1 of 3
posted on 9/6/12
Don't need a CM, we need a RW.
posted on 9/6/12
Torres
Hazard - Mata - Ramires
Mikel - Modric
is better than
Torres
Hazard - Mata - Hulk
Mikel - Ramires
posted on 9/6/12
Or Hulk + Modric at 65.
Not a bad deal.
In terms of value for money, maybe Modric. Watching him for Spurs and the amount of attacks he starts and keeps flowingfrom midfield is something we desperately need at Chelsea. Lampard did a decent job there at the end of the season, but Modric will do it a lot better.
posted on 9/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/6/12
Lampard did a decent job there at the end of the season, but Modric will do it a lot better.
===============
Disagree. Lampard gave him the run-around in the FA cup.
posted on 9/6/12
Lampard actually played quite poorly till his super goal against Spurs in the FA cup semi. I feel Hulk could make us very potent but at that price, I think Modric might be better value. As someone above said, Ramires at right wing with Modric behind is slightly better than Ramires deep and Hulk further forward on the right wing.
posted on 9/6/12
Lampard actually played quite poorly till his super goal against Spurs in the FA cup semi.
==================
Perhaps but Modric was in no way better
And we need Hulk. We'll become too lightweight without a player like him - direct and strong.
Look at
City - Yaya
Madrid - Ronaldo
posted on 9/6/12
Hulk all the way, i don't care how much he costs we need him . Need em both really though
posted on 9/6/12
But he is green...ugh!
posted on 9/6/12
TBH i dont want to push the price of Modric up and hopes he goes somewhere for less than £25million, just so we can say we offered you £30+million last year but took the p1$$ and didnt take it!
posted on 9/6/12
Value for money- Modric
Who do we need more- Hulk
posted on 9/6/12
MODRIC!!!
Ridiculous how people believe we don't need a CM.
posted on 9/6/12
Ridiculous how people believe we don't need a CM.
----------
You know, a good few games doesn't make Mikel a star all of a sudden. As i've said before he excels in games where we need to defend, but when we need to attack he is not the man. We need modric, offers us even more options and systems
posted on 9/6/12
Hulk is strong but does go to ground a bit too easily. But i do think we need him more than Modric though his cost is quite honestly a rip-off.
posted on 9/6/12
But my opinion on the original post is choose Modric at that price and stick with Rami on the right.
posted on 9/6/12
Hulk will shift several times more shirts than Modric will. Also he provides some physical strength to our attack which we seriously lack with Drogba gone.
posted on 9/6/12
As a deep lying play-maker? Modric is defintely better then Lampard there, Lampard may have had a few good games at the end of the season, but I very much doubt he will keep that up for next season.
Like I said, watching Spurs play a lot, it is quite brilliant watching Modric keeping attacks flowing and starting them off as well. We should definitely be looking to get a player like that in our team. Lampard at 33/34 is not going to do it for a whole season.
posted on 9/6/12
We need a CM or a CF more than we need a RW
posted on 9/6/12
Who is gunna play RW then TBK? Your favourite boy Sturridge? The guy is absoulete cack and we'll get destroyed once again next season. We need Hulk or someone else as RW. And we have 2 cfs in Torres and Lukaku
posted on 9/6/12
Marin or Sturridge. You say that but if he can re-create his RW form he'll easily fit in, Lukaku's going on loan and I'm surpirsed people are willing to trust on just Torres and Sturridge as our CF for the whole of next season - neither have shown they can be consistent in scoring goals for a full season at Chelsea, or be that man ib a big game to carry the team.
posted on 9/6/12
*RW form for the first half of the season he'll fit in
posted on 9/6/12
Although I have not seen much of Hulk I like the idea of signing a forward that can play out wide or down the middle, that makes a lot of sense to me and I would argue we need that type of player more than we do Modric now.
posted on 9/6/12
He is worse as a CF thuogh, that's my problem
posted on 9/6/12
We need a RW, Sturridge can't be trusted.
posted on 9/6/12
Hulk as a RW > Sturridge as a RW
Hulk as a CF > Sturridge as a CF
Hulk at defending > Sturridge at defending
Best solution - Sell Sturridge and Buy Hulk
Page 1 of 3