Ok ok, if i have a spare millennium anytime soon i will have a read
Can't help but feel this has all been caused through some sort of misunderstanding
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
KEEP OUT OF THIS KENTWUM!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Reading through about 5 lines of both Dave and JPBs comments, we can safely arrive at the conclusion that this is both a pointless and boring argument
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Kent is gay for Dave lols.
I agree with sideshow. He is right.
Or be a lady.
Pretending to be a lady can be fun. it is up to you JPB.
the choice is yours
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I think you have got this whole debating system muddled up Dave.
Dave,
I've taken the meaningless flannel out of the posts that you have written since my latest thorough and comprehensive analysis of the situation and answer to your previous questions.
The resulting post without the meaingless flannel is below :
I told you to be a man JPB
I completely agree JPB.
The final 2 thirds of that comment really connected with me on a personal level.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Dave just leave them
Why dont you join tonights match thread instead
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/129000
I answered your (irrelevant and futile) question in full in my post on page 106 of this thread.
Any points relevant to the discussion about your erroneous and misleading advice is contained either in my posts on page 104 of this thread or in my posts on page 106 of this thread, or in the posts on both of those pages.
All of the points which I have made have been proven on one or both of those pages, and all of the points which you have made which may be capable of having some relevance have been disproven on one or both of those pages.
There is no need to say anything further on the matter.
Mr Chelsea i think you should return that back to its rightful owner, as we can clearly see Dave is spineless.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
The argument might well be 'pointless', but as members of a forum, you must see that when you're debating something, you want to respond if you disagree?
Everyday married life would diminish your intensity for righteous indignation.After a couple of years not only wouldn't you give a flying f uck,you wouldn't have listened in the first place
In failing to explain yourself, you are simply admitting that you don't have it in you to admit when you're wrong.
=========================
For the avoidance of doubt, as a general principle, I am prepared to admit any instances where I have been wrong.
Whether this is or isnot the case however has no bearing whatsoever on whether I have been wrong on this thread. I have not been wrong. You have been wrong. Both of these points have been thoroughly and comprehensively demosntrated throughout this thread.
Your question therefore has no bearing whatsoever on the discussion.
However your questions and all relevant matters have been adressed on pages 104 and 106 of this thread, in which all of your defences have been proven invalid.
Sign in if you want to comment
England 1-1 France: Official Match Thread
Page 107 of 108
104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108
posted on 21/6/12
Ok ok, if i have a spare millennium anytime soon i will have a read
posted on 21/6/12
Can't help but feel this has all been caused through some sort of misunderstanding
posted on 21/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/6/12
KEEP OUT OF THIS KENTWUM!
posted on 21/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/6/12
Reading through about 5 lines of both Dave and JPBs comments, we can safely arrive at the conclusion that this is both a pointless and boring argument
posted on 21/6/12
Leave Dave alone
posted on 21/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/6/12
Kent is gay for Dave lols.
I agree with sideshow. He is right.
posted on 21/6/12
Be the bigger man JPB
posted on 21/6/12
Or be a lady.
Pretending to be a lady can be fun. it is up to you JPB.
the choice is yours
posted on 21/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/6/12
I think you have got this whole debating system muddled up Dave.
posted on 21/6/12
Dave,
I've taken the meaningless flannel out of the posts that you have written since my latest thorough and comprehensive analysis of the situation and answer to your previous questions.
The resulting post without the meaingless flannel is below :
posted on 21/6/12
I told you to be a man JPB
posted on 21/6/12
I completely agree JPB.
The final 2 thirds of that comment really connected with me on a personal level.
posted on 21/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/6/12
Dave just leave them
Why dont you join tonights match thread instead
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/129000
posted on 21/6/12
I answered your (irrelevant and futile) question in full in my post on page 106 of this thread.
Any points relevant to the discussion about your erroneous and misleading advice is contained either in my posts on page 104 of this thread or in my posts on page 106 of this thread, or in the posts on both of those pages.
All of the points which I have made have been proven on one or both of those pages, and all of the points which you have made which may be capable of having some relevance have been disproven on one or both of those pages.
There is no need to say anything further on the matter.
posted on 21/6/12
Dave I've got your back!
posted on 21/6/12
Mr Chelsea i think you should return that back to its rightful owner, as we can clearly see Dave is spineless.
posted on 21/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/6/12
Ron
posted on 21/6/12
The argument might well be 'pointless', but as members of a forum, you must see that when you're debating something, you want to respond if you disagree?
Everyday married life would diminish your intensity for righteous indignation.After a couple of years not only wouldn't you give a flying f uck,you wouldn't have listened in the first place
posted on 21/6/12
In failing to explain yourself, you are simply admitting that you don't have it in you to admit when you're wrong.
=========================
For the avoidance of doubt, as a general principle, I am prepared to admit any instances where I have been wrong.
Whether this is or isnot the case however has no bearing whatsoever on whether I have been wrong on this thread. I have not been wrong. You have been wrong. Both of these points have been thoroughly and comprehensively demosntrated throughout this thread.
Your question therefore has no bearing whatsoever on the discussion.
However your questions and all relevant matters have been adressed on pages 104 and 106 of this thread, in which all of your defences have been proven invalid.
Page 107 of 108
104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108