or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 77 comments are related to an article called:

The house of cards...

Page 3 of 4

posted on 25/6/12

No problem Hill billy,off to make dinner anyway,laters.

posted on 25/6/12

It's all a bit mental on here.

1. If Celtic were advised that EBT's should not be used and as a result paid in full the missing Tax. Then that is not in any way cheating. If Rangers had paid the £90 million odd that is owed then I would also agree that they had paid the money, so deserved the titles.
Rangers will not and cannot pay............

2. Rangers deliberately withheld NI and PAYE from their staffs wages to finance the club. They new this was and is illegal. This is most certainly cheating as it is a deliberate act to deceive the tax authorities.

3. EBT's are not actually illegal. the problem is not that Rangers used them, it is how they used them. Basically as a mechanism to pay higher wages to contracted players and avoid tax. Basically having dual contracts. That is illegal.

So Mr Duke, do you understand why yir team is totally shafted?

posted on 25/6/12

comment by jukeboxjunkie - Right Enough (U10162)
posted 3 seconds ago
No we made a mistake in using an EBT once, paid all the money back in full and never used it again.

==

agree caught cheating paid the price.
==
Rangers on the other hand.. Knew EBT's were dodge, used them for 10 years, used them as a method of posting players dual contacts (against spl rules which is why your under investigation), duped the nation out of millions of pounds and had no intention if paying it back (uz never will)
==
conjecture
===
Thus is why there is no comparison between us and your lot of cheating bassas. This is why we as a club are in the healthiest position we've been in for years, where as your lot are brown bread and a complete disgrace to Scottish football.

==

sorry as you said at the start YOU are the only cheats in town
===
Duke, you're normally sound and I realise your hurting but seriously, you're not doing yourself any favours here. If anything it looks like you're clutching at straws.

==

factual straws though YES

posted on 25/6/12

Fish has nailed it.

That's the difference between Celtic and Rangers.

Think you should go for a pint, it a doobie Duke. Relax, try and take your mind of things

posted on 25/6/12

Or a doobie.. Flucking autocorrect

Now I need one

posted on 25/6/12

1. If Celtic were advised that EBT's should not be used and as a result paid in full the missing Tax. Then that is not in any way cheating. If Rangers had paid the £90 million odd that is owed then I would also agree that they had paid the money, so deserved the titles.
Rangers will not and cannot pay...........

==

no I would say both clubs tried to busk the system
Is it only cheating when it reaches a certain value?
===
2. Rangers deliberately withheld NI and PAYE from their staffs wages to finance the club. They new this was and is illegal. This is most certainly cheating as it is a deliberate act to deceive the tax authorities.
==

The staff at the club had their tax and national insurance contributions stolen by a crook

====

3. EBT's are not actually illegal. the problem is not that Rangers used them, it is how they used them. Basically as a mechanism to pay higher wages to contracted players and avoid tax. Basically having dual contracts. That is illegal.
==
As it stands only one club in Scotland used EBTs in an inappropriate way.
Dual contracts are not illegal... where do folk get this stuff?
Against SFA rule yes but illegal NO
And as yet unproven.

posted on 25/6/12

So if Rangers had the cash and paid the tax back everything would be hunky dory. The fact that we have fallen on hard times and can't pay it back is a crime ?.Moral of the story it's o.k. to cheat just dinnae get caught. .

posted on 25/6/12

or when you get caught cheating just say ooooppppssss sorry huv it back then

and they say cheats never prosper seems in Celtics case this is untrue

posted on 25/6/12

We never cheated. We didn't use EBT's as a form of dual contracts. It'll come out soon enough that Rangers did indeed do exactly that.

posted on 25/6/12

Still trying to compare Dukey

We had it on our annual Reports..did Rangers have every one on their report..or even any atall

posted on 25/6/12

comment by CHARLIE HARPER - THEY CHEATED THE SCHOOLS,POLIS AND THE ARMY (U5716)
posted 25 seconds ago
Still trying to compare Dukey

==

You have a point mate

you cant compare a confirmed cheat with one still on appeal

posted on 25/6/12

Got me that link Dukey

comment by (U5278)

posted on 25/6/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 25/6/12

Got a link to that Dos

You have Mitre trying to compare Rangers to Leeds..then Cooper thinks the club aint dead..even when Walter,Naisy and Whittaker say otherwise..then Dukey is comparing what we did to what his ex club have done

comment by (U5278)

posted on 25/6/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 25/6/12

I'm not calling you a liar..but I would just like a link

Remember it was beyond dispute that Rangers would not go to the wall

comment by BB⁷ (U13430)

posted on 25/6/12

Duke, I can now see why you and Ally are pally.

posted on 25/6/12

Charlie got a link harper

posted on 25/6/12

posted on 25/6/12

Root Doot to you Hawkie

My Italy bet looks good..two more wins then I get the big bucks

posted on 25/6/12

No way charlie Germany v spain final for me.

comment by BB⁷ (U13430)

posted on 25/6/12

Hawky, ja606 fight night.. Should be a white collar boxing night, bears v tims. £20 a man. If tims win money will be donated to thai tims. If bears win you can donate it to the florists you stole from.

posted on 25/6/12

Germany's boogie team is Italy

I reckon this could go to pens.

Rules not rule out Ronaldo and co just yet

posted on 25/6/12

If tims win money will be donated to thai tims. If bears win you can donate it to the florists you stole from.


Its just you me and ginger that is going to fight night the rest are scared stiff. I have my sock at the ready with a pool ball in it. Where's your tool

comment by (U5278)

posted on 25/6/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Page 3 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment