geeeze that is very strong
They sent this to member clubs wooowww
The existing first division club should state now that they will not play in spl2 if this ridiculous knee- jerk complete restructuring of the national sport goes ahead. Ain't much of an spl2 with only Cowdenbeath in it.
What a shambles our game is - it's a disgrace how inept we seem to be
Glad you're happy......
Hope you enjoy your 'victory'.
I like how the bit in the document shows how the Government are looking after us too!
The establishment links are not dead afterall!
Hope you enjoy your 'victory'.
===
Is it a 'victory' ?
I though we were doing as we are told.
For the benifit of all others.
Mitre seems to think it's a 'victory'.
's left right and centre.
Maybe we should have an integrity fund raiser.
For every fiver that clubs will lose through Rangers Athletic being put in the third division, we will give a tenner.
"comment by Bhoyzilla (U9600)
posted 9 seconds ago
Maybe we should have an integrity fund raiser.
For every fiver that clubs will lose through Rangers Athletic being put in the third division, we will give a tenner."
Apparently you would need to raise £32 million though.
well he is happy he might have a team to watch next year
Im sure you would be the same if it was you.
I await oh no I wouldnae
Hector,
Its all part and parcel of the game mate. You lot enjoy rubbing our faces in it at every chance, im allowed to do the same!
Wonder how UEFA will react to the fact that the scottish Government are involved,pretty sure thats not allowed.
No, we are doing as we are told.
Just like you, hector, and all the others have wanted us to do from the start.
Your only problem is that this is not what YOU want.
Apparently you would need to raise £32 million though.
=======================
Is that just for the wee tax case or the ticketus cash?
How much for the rest?
Tim - nice try. Did UEFA object to the Scottish Communities Cup (i.e the Scottish Cup)?
Nope
Try again
"WHICH WILL DELIVER BENEFITS TO THE SCOTTISH FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Scottish Government remain committed to our community strategy"
Im sure UEFA dont mind if a government supports a community strategy or not. Also im sure its at the Government discression if it wants to pull funding from football at a time of an economic downturn to help the pay for other things.
Especially with folk like that Carr not paying their taxes.
Scottish Government remain committed to our community strategy
===
Honestly I think they will be pleased.
Funding for our game from any source is great
As long as they are not interfering It should be
"comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 minute ago
Scottish Government remain committed to our community strategy
===
Honestly I think they will be pleased.
Funding for our game from any source is great
As long as they are not interfering It should be "
I disagree, I would be annoyed if they were not involved.
This is people's jobs and livelyhood we are discussing. This comes ahead of football and its the Governments job to apply heat to make sure the jobs are secured.
Clubs are expected to vote in favour of rangers so they can afford players that aren't good enough to beat rangers.
It's getting very interesting now. Heating up nicely.
The SPL clubs have said no to a newco and they might have had a wee phone call about this deal being handed out.
Give the wee teams in the 1st a bung to let Rangers in and in a season all is back to normal.
That way they show their fans that they never allowed them up, it was the greedy wee teams.....Shame on them.
I wonder how the teams in the 1st will vote on this...
Im not sure that is how UEFA see it Mitre
However nobody could disagree with that sentiment
"comment by Bhoyzilla (U9600)
posted 5 seconds ago
It's getting very interesting now. Heating up nicely.
The SPL clubs have said no to a newco and they might have had a wee phone call about this deal being handed out.
Give the wee teams in the 1st a bung to let Rangers in and in a season all is back to normal.
That way they show their fans that they never allowed them up, it was the greedy wee teams.....Shame on them.
I wonder how the teams in the 1st will vote on this..."
Doesnt really matter.
SFA have all but said if they vote against it they will create an SPL 2 with Rangers in it anyway.
Jobs! We've seen mining, textiles, shipbuilding and the steel industry being destroyed taking thousands of jobs, how many do rangers employ?
Bomber Brown to the rescue
"comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 49 seconds ago
Im not sure that is how UEFA see it Mitre
However nobody could disagree with that sentiment"
Let Uefa take on big Alex, there is only gonna be one winner there.
Uefa are not big enough to take on a government on an issue like this.
SFA have all but said
===============
Giving them a lot of power there my good man.
Sign in if you want to comment
SFA - "Gers cant be banned or suspended"
Page 1 of 3
posted on 28/6/12
geeeze that is very strong
They sent this to member clubs wooowww
posted on 28/6/12
The existing first division club should state now that they will not play in spl2 if this ridiculous knee- jerk complete restructuring of the national sport goes ahead. Ain't much of an spl2 with only Cowdenbeath in it.
What a shambles our game is - it's a disgrace how inept we seem to be
posted on 28/6/12
Glad you're happy......
Hope you enjoy your 'victory'.
posted on 28/6/12
I like how the bit in the document shows how the Government are looking after us too!
The establishment links are not dead afterall!
posted on 28/6/12
Hope you enjoy your 'victory'.
===
Is it a 'victory' ?
I though we were doing as we are told.
For the benifit of all others.
posted on 28/6/12
Mitre seems to think it's a 'victory'.
's left right and centre.
posted on 28/6/12
Maybe we should have an integrity fund raiser.
For every fiver that clubs will lose through Rangers Athletic being put in the third division, we will give a tenner.
posted on 28/6/12
"comment by Bhoyzilla (U9600)
posted 9 seconds ago
Maybe we should have an integrity fund raiser.
For every fiver that clubs will lose through Rangers Athletic being put in the third division, we will give a tenner."
Apparently you would need to raise £32 million though.
posted on 28/6/12
well he is happy he might have a team to watch next year
Im sure you would be the same if it was you.
I await oh no I wouldnae
posted on 28/6/12
Hector,
Its all part and parcel of the game mate. You lot enjoy rubbing our faces in it at every chance, im allowed to do the same!
posted on 28/6/12
Wonder how UEFA will react to the fact that the scottish Government are involved,pretty sure thats not allowed.
posted on 28/6/12
No, we are doing as we are told.
Just like you, hector, and all the others have wanted us to do from the start.
Your only problem is that this is not what YOU want.
posted on 28/6/12
Apparently you would need to raise £32 million though.
=======================
Is that just for the wee tax case or the ticketus cash?
How much for the rest?
posted on 28/6/12
Tim - nice try. Did UEFA object to the Scottish Communities Cup (i.e the Scottish Cup)?
Nope
Try again
posted on 28/6/12
"WHICH WILL DELIVER BENEFITS TO THE SCOTTISH FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Scottish Government remain committed to our community strategy"
Im sure UEFA dont mind if a government supports a community strategy or not. Also im sure its at the Government discression if it wants to pull funding from football at a time of an economic downturn to help the pay for other things.
Especially with folk like that Carr not paying their taxes.
posted on 28/6/12
Scottish Government remain committed to our community strategy
===
Honestly I think they will be pleased.
Funding for our game from any source is great
As long as they are not interfering It should be
posted on 28/6/12
"comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 minute ago
Scottish Government remain committed to our community strategy
===
Honestly I think they will be pleased.
Funding for our game from any source is great
As long as they are not interfering It should be "
I disagree, I would be annoyed if they were not involved.
This is people's jobs and livelyhood we are discussing. This comes ahead of football and its the Governments job to apply heat to make sure the jobs are secured.
posted on 28/6/12
Clubs are expected to vote in favour of rangers so they can afford players that aren't good enough to beat rangers.
posted on 28/6/12
It's getting very interesting now. Heating up nicely.
The SPL clubs have said no to a newco and they might have had a wee phone call about this deal being handed out.
Give the wee teams in the 1st a bung to let Rangers in and in a season all is back to normal.
That way they show their fans that they never allowed them up, it was the greedy wee teams.....Shame on them.
I wonder how the teams in the 1st will vote on this...
posted on 28/6/12
Im not sure that is how UEFA see it Mitre
However nobody could disagree with that sentiment
posted on 28/6/12
"comment by Bhoyzilla (U9600)
posted 5 seconds ago
It's getting very interesting now. Heating up nicely.
The SPL clubs have said no to a newco and they might have had a wee phone call about this deal being handed out.
Give the wee teams in the 1st a bung to let Rangers in and in a season all is back to normal.
That way they show their fans that they never allowed them up, it was the greedy wee teams.....Shame on them.
I wonder how the teams in the 1st will vote on this..."
Doesnt really matter.
SFA have all but said if they vote against it they will create an SPL 2 with Rangers in it anyway.
posted on 28/6/12
Jobs! We've seen mining, textiles, shipbuilding and the steel industry being destroyed taking thousands of jobs, how many do rangers employ?
posted on 28/6/12
Bomber Brown to the rescue
posted on 28/6/12
"comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 49 seconds ago
Im not sure that is how UEFA see it Mitre
However nobody could disagree with that sentiment"
Let Uefa take on big Alex, there is only gonna be one winner there.
Uefa are not big enough to take on a government on an issue like this.
posted on 28/6/12
SFA have all but said
===============
Giving them a lot of power there my good man.
Page 1 of 3