Fack me. Awful weekend

CEF. I make my score 17 not 14:-

Manchester Utd v Tottenham Hotspur 2-1 (1-0) +5 (+5)
Bournemouth v Aston Villa 1-1 (0-1) -2 (+3)
Everton v Watford 2-0 (2-2) -2 (+1)
Leicester v Sunderland 2-1 (4-2) +3 (+4)
Norwich v Crystal Palace 1-1 (1-3) -2 (+2)
Chelsea v Swansea 3-0 (2-2) -2 (0)
Arsenal v West Ham 2-0 (0-2) -2 (-2)
Newcastle v Southampton 0-0 (2-2 +5 (+3)
Stoke v Liverpool 0-1 (0-1) +10 (+13)
WBA v Manchester City 1-3 (0-3) +3 (+16)
Leeds v Burnley 1-2 (1-1) -2 (+14)
Bolton v Derby 1-1 (0-0) +5 (+19)
Rotherham v MK Dons 1-0 (1-4) -2 (+17)

My score, (actual score), +/-, (my points),

Im in +...good start

OP... how come I'm not on the table of results yet?

RESULTS updated at end of Week 1.

wolfie, table now includes WBA result which should sort your query out.

Robben - you are now included mate

Oh right yes - cheers matey

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

CEF wishes he had

Need to go away and study the rules again. Im really confused now.....doesn't take much mind.

Right got it now. Got confused by the "Matches" heading in the table, shouldn't that be "Credits for last round" or summat?

I think he needs to shorten it as much as possible to make it fit into the table. It should actually read "credits won from match predictions" or something close to that

crd frm mch prdctns?

Still too long I think. Maybe have a key above the table and write tje acronyms?

It doesn't matter how long it is as it will adjust to two rows (as it does in the main table for those with long names)... Cred. Rem. would be fine.

comment by Wumpatrol (U5046)
posted 9 minutes ago
I think he needs to shorten it as much as possible to make it fit into the table. It should actually read "credits won from match predictions" or something close to that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Credits Won (or lost if you have a little minus sign next to the number) from match predictions in the 2015 - 16 king of Pundits JA606 game."

That'll clear any confusion.

Oh yeah, good point.

And yeah I do agree it is confusing, I joined this week and wondered why some people had already played 38 times

That was clearly not directed at Belmonty

comment by Wumpatrol (U5046)
posted 23 seconds ago
That was clearly not directed at Belmonty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I gathered

There is only one thing you really need to know.


I AM KING OF THE PUNDITS

comment by Wumpatrol (U5046)
posted 1 minute ago
That was clearly not directed at Belmonty
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm just trying to help

Nice to see 5 Wolves supporters on here so watch out, we'll be taking this comp by storm.

I will change headings as I can see why there is some confusion. All you really need to know though, is I am

C ompletely
R ubbish
A t
P redicting !!!