"I've not heard or seen McCoist say anything about Lawwell. Can someone give me a quote please?"
======================
'No, because there isn't one
He mentioned the Celtic statement about sporting integrity & he agreed with it but then said sporting integrity must be the basis of the next vote also.......or words to that effect.
No mention of lawwell or any digs at Celtic, some have obviously read or heard the story from a media outlet who have tweaked his words to make it sound sinister!!!'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for that Brum. Far better to deal in the facts than media sensationalism.
Though if the OP is just at the wind-up, so be it.
looks like they sre still looking for offence when there is none to be had.
I don't get offended by mad Ally or Browns remarks however I do get angry at the indifference of certain organisations that would be very quick to come down on the man in the street if he pandered to the moronic element of the old firm such as these two.
If I made a remark about Charles Green life being in danger because of information I had. Chap Chap
If I started to single out a certain group, organisation or group of people because of their beliefs. Chap Chap
Its called Incitement, when you fabricate facts or fiction to promote action or gain at any cost to innocent party's.
Sporting integrity has nothing to do with what's best for Rangers.
Sporting integrity would see you booted out completely, and having to work your way back into the 3rd division.
Is that in Rangers' best interests?
Lawell has been very professional all along. Not once did he go to the press about his intentions on the vote
-------------
aye, he waited til others made the decision for him. sleekit. he wanted rangers in the spl, no doubt, he just wanted to pull the wool over your eyes so you didnt realise that.
and you all fell for his bull yet again
You have proven what everyone is saying. Brown gobs off and you all buy in. You are trying to turn Lawell saying nothing into something sinister. Go concentrate on your new club and worry about us when you earn your place in the SPL
Was that in response to my point?
Sorry but i just dont know what you are on about.
Hampden.
Yes it is in our best interest. Why? Less stigma/ridicule attached as we are punished like others before us as per the rules.
Now that's what I call sporting integrity.
Don't you?
You don't know what I am on about? It is pretty clear.
You are determined to prove that Lawell is sly. He says nothing and you take that as sly. If he had stated intentions either way you would have taken it to suit your attitude towards him.
Don't be angry at him just because he runs our club properly
Now run along to your own board.
You are determined to prove that Lawell is sly. He says nothing and you take that as sly. If he had stated intentions either way you would have taken it to suit your attitude towards him.
-----------------
i dont give a fck about "proving" he is sly. it's my opinion based on how he has handled the voting.
if you dont like it - tough sheidt, phone an embassy or something.
if he had come out either way i would have respect for him. but no, the sleekit one bottles it and waits for the chairman of the other teams to make the decision. He was full of it before saying celtic dont need rangers to thrive. so why didnt he put his money where his mouth is?
Because he's gutless
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well, if relegation to div 3 is in Rangers' best interest, someone should have told Green and McCoist before they cast the oldco's vote at Hampden park on Weds.
Yes, that's right--the same Pie Man who now wants to go to div 3.
Just on that, do you think he's saying that to the players he's trying to sign right now.
No, me neither.
The guy is a ffud--pure and simple.
But as I have said so many times--as long as he's in charge at Ibrox, I'll be a happy man
Sign in if you want to comment
Peter Lawwell
Page 2 of 2
posted on 6/7/12
"I've not heard or seen McCoist say anything about Lawwell. Can someone give me a quote please?"
======================
'No, because there isn't one
He mentioned the Celtic statement about sporting integrity & he agreed with it but then said sporting integrity must be the basis of the next vote also.......or words to that effect.
No mention of lawwell or any digs at Celtic, some have obviously read or heard the story from a media outlet who have tweaked his words to make it sound sinister!!!'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for that Brum. Far better to deal in the facts than media sensationalism.
Though if the OP is just at the wind-up, so be it.
posted on 6/7/12
looks like they sre still looking for offence when there is none to be had.
I don't get offended by mad Ally or Browns remarks however I do get angry at the indifference of certain organisations that would be very quick to come down on the man in the street if he pandered to the moronic element of the old firm such as these two.
If I made a remark about Charles Green life being in danger because of information I had. Chap Chap
If I started to single out a certain group, organisation or group of people because of their beliefs. Chap Chap
Its called Incitement, when you fabricate facts or fiction to promote action or gain at any cost to innocent party's.
posted on 6/7/12
Sporting integrity has nothing to do with what's best for Rangers.
Sporting integrity would see you booted out completely, and having to work your way back into the 3rd division.
Is that in Rangers' best interests?
posted on 6/7/12
Lawell has been very professional all along. Not once did he go to the press about his intentions on the vote
-------------
aye, he waited til others made the decision for him. sleekit. he wanted rangers in the spl, no doubt, he just wanted to pull the wool over your eyes so you didnt realise that.
and you all fell for his bull yet again
posted on 6/7/12
You have proven what everyone is saying. Brown gobs off and you all buy in. You are trying to turn Lawell saying nothing into something sinister. Go concentrate on your new club and worry about us when you earn your place in the SPL
posted on 6/7/12
Was that in response to my point?
Sorry but i just dont know what you are on about.
posted on 6/7/12
Hampden.
Yes it is in our best interest. Why? Less stigma/ridicule attached as we are punished like others before us as per the rules.
Now that's what I call sporting integrity.
Don't you?
posted on 6/7/12
You don't know what I am on about? It is pretty clear.
You are determined to prove that Lawell is sly. He says nothing and you take that as sly. If he had stated intentions either way you would have taken it to suit your attitude towards him.
Don't be angry at him just because he runs our club properly
Now run along to your own board.
posted on 6/7/12
You are determined to prove that Lawell is sly. He says nothing and you take that as sly. If he had stated intentions either way you would have taken it to suit your attitude towards him.
-----------------
i dont give a fck about "proving" he is sly. it's my opinion based on how he has handled the voting.
if you dont like it - tough sheidt, phone an embassy or something.
if he had come out either way i would have respect for him. but no, the sleekit one bottles it and waits for the chairman of the other teams to make the decision. He was full of it before saying celtic dont need rangers to thrive. so why didnt he put his money where his mouth is?
Because he's gutless
posted on 6/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/7/12
Well, if relegation to div 3 is in Rangers' best interest, someone should have told Green and McCoist before they cast the oldco's vote at Hampden park on Weds.
Yes, that's right--the same Pie Man who now wants to go to div 3.
Just on that, do you think he's saying that to the players he's trying to sign right now.
No, me neither.
The guy is a ffud--pure and simple.
But as I have said so many times--as long as he's in charge at Ibrox, I'll be a happy man
Page 2 of 2