Like I said, I lulled you into the bear trap and you stepped on it.

This is your lowest point on ja606 - enjoy

Rough me up Vince....make sure i can see the lycra.......

You slept on it and came back with that

You're out of ideas, out of sorts and clearly out of gas

As i have said before.....i post with Ric Flair and it kills you every time.

"Mr Suarez's evidence was unreliable in relation to matters of critical importance. It was, in part, inconsistent with the evidence, especially the video footage"

Its almost as if the FA allowed evra to recount his tale whilst watching the footage and then getting suarez to retell his version without such aides?

As for the other matter of "critical importance" they bought that guff about evra being incensed by a "foul" on a previously damaged knee. A foul that clearly never takes place. The whole thing should have stopped at that point when they viewed the footage and so no such foul take place.
Mr Evra, you are a liar and a big big snide

In a previous disciplinary hearing Mr Evra's testimony was found to be 'exaggerated and unreliable'. However, despite changing his account numerous times, this time the FA believed him and didn't take sanctions against him for his own abusive comments, which started the whole sorry affair.

The whole thing was a massive stitch up. The FA had an agenda and this case fitted it perfectly. I wonder if the FA will take any sanctions against the drug test avoider for his twitter 'choc-ice' comments? Probably not.

As i have said before.....i post with Ric Flair and it kills you every time
.....

And as i have said, you slept on it and came back with nothing.

Outta gas and nearly out of smileys

I wonder if the FA will take any sanctions against the drug test avoider for his twitter 'choc-ice' comments? Probably not.
===============

course not paisley. unfortunatley it's one rule for one, one rule for another in this country.

Ferdinand should be ashamed of himself and he really is as thick as I thought he was.

Jesus are you lot still whinging!

Rio didn't say anything about Choc-ice, get your fachkts right ladies!

Of course he didn't, that's why he removed the tweet.

Come on Reginald, don't just read the headline, try the whole story, it'd stop you making a tool out of yourself

I have looked at what is supposed to be the whole story, he repeated what someone else said, agreed with it and laughed. Not sure what there is to get wrong about that....

I have looked at what is supposed to be the whole story, he repeated what someone else said, agreed with it and laughed. Not sure what there is to get wrong about that....
==================

He did more than that mate. He approved the comment and distributed it with his approval to all of his followers

Its almost as if the FA allowed evra to recount his tale whilst watching the footage and then getting suarez to retell his version without such aides
---------------
That unfortunately is exactly what happened.

Its almost as if the FA allowed evra to recount his tale whilst watching the footage and then getting suarez to retell his version without such aides
---------------
That unfortunately is exactly what happened.


I know mate, was an attempt at sarcasm!
I just find it strange how rival fans fail to see how this has no bearing on the accuracy of the information you give when one party uses video footage and one doesnt! (this was after all a MAJOR part of the panels closing statement as to why they found suarez less credible)
Also, the very fact that the panel can use second hand translation from comolli et al when the spanish does not even make sense is not only wrong, but its a massive insult to suarez who is actually able to speak the language.
we have gone over this time and time again, but can ONE person provide any credence to evra's claim of being incensed by a kick to the knee in the corner. This was the incident that riled him so much so please, if evra is a credible character, have a look at that and provide your support for the "foul"

The Evra kick to the knee was much like the contact for Rodwell's sending off against Suarez at Goodison.....Minimal contact but enough to be a foul

comment by johnsonsbaby (U10461)
posted 17 hours, 2 minutes ago
Its almost as if the FA allowed evra to recount his tale whilst watching the footage and then getting suarez to retell his version without such aides
---------------
That unfortunately is exactly what happened.

...................

Were you there?

Nobody needed to be there.

It has been officially recorded that it happened.

By the F.A.

corrupt surfers

VC - it's in the report!

"Introduction - 12.During the interview, the FA and Mr Evra watched some video footage of the match. Mr
Evra pointed out to the FA, by reference to the video footage, when it was during the match that Mr Suarez made the comments about which Mr Evra had complained. This information enabled the FA to ask broadcasters to provide video footage of what appeared to be the key moments of the game, so far as Mr Evra's complaint was concerned. This video footage was provided in due course. It contained material which was not broadcast, including footage of the exchanges in the penalty area in the 63rdminute taken from a number of different camera angles."

Sorry I should have put point 11. from the report in there first as that is the start of the interview process for the two players-

11. On Thursday 20 October, Ms Kennedy, the Head of Off-Field Regulation and a member of the Regulatory Legal Team at the FA, interviewed Mr Evra in Manchester. Mr Evra was asked to give further details about what had happened during the match, which he did. This included mentioning the names of other players who, so Mr Evra thought, might be able to give relevant evidence.

Then point 12 shows how they conducted the interview with Evra. Now point 13 shows how they condcted the inerview with Suarez.

13. The FA arranged to meet Mr Suarez to obtain his account of what had taken place between him and Mr Evra during the match. Ms Kennedy interviewed Mr Suarez on 2 November in Liverpool. Mr Suarez was accompanied by an interpreter from the Club (Mr
Adrian McGrath), Ms Ward and Ms Wignall. An independent professional interpreter (Mr Hugo Pinero) was also present. On the same day, the FA also interviewed Mr Kenny Dalglish (the Liverpool manager), Mr Damien Comolli (the Liverpool Director of Football), Mr Ray Haughan (the Liverpool Team Administration Manager) and Mr Kuyt. The interviews were recorded and transcripts were produced.

comment by johnsonsbaby (U10461)
posted 15 minutes ago
VC - it's in the report!

................

Is this the same report where Suarez admits his guilt, that you lot keep ignoring, or is this a report made up by Liverpool fans?

The guy is a dispicable piece of work, get over it.

Bearing in mind the report goes into minutiae, at no point is Suarez given access to video footage. That in itself is unfair but to then use how his account of events was not as clearly stated as Evra's in coming to their verdict is grossly unfair, when one gave evidence while looking at a video and one didn't!