Comment deleted by Site Moderator
See VC is getting owned again. Sometimes it's like he does not understand the meaning on words!
Evra is a filthy liar. Disgusting. And the Mancs defend him. Even more disgusting.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
VC - on the pitch Suarez has done some crazy things. Off the pitch he is a quiet individual. Terry on the other hand is bad on and off the pitch as are Barton, Balotelli, Rooney etc. etc. Duncan Ferguson served prison time for an act of thuggery on the field, and displayed the same violence towards random individuals off the field. That makes his behaviour part of his nature.
If Suarez acted 'despicably' off the pitch you may have a point, but he doesn't. Label him a crazy player or despicable player if that's the sort of language that comes easier to you but his behaviour has two very clearly defined differences.
See VC is getting owned again. Sometimes it's like he does not understand the meaning on words!
......................
Hoody,
I don't think you understand the meaning of the word 'owned'.
This is from the report. This is why Suarez was found gulity.
................
Mr Suarez said that he pinched Mr Evra's skin in an attempt to defuse the situation. He also said that his use of the word 'negro' to address Mr Evra was conciliatory and friendly. We rejected that evidence”
Independent Regulatory Commission report
...........................
You can bury this all you want, and you can keep pretending this is not in the report, but it is.
And it left Luis looking as gulity as a puppy sitting next to a pile of pooh.
Oh you thought he looked guilty? I did not think. Case closed then!
Not for one minute do I think you dress yourself in the morning.
VC - on the pitch Suarez has done some crazy things.
..................
Really. You think?
Nobody's pretending anything VC - it's you who clearly hasn't read the report or you wouldn't need to ask if we were there when we spoke of Evra being allowed to watch video and Suarez not.
The FA's decision is baed on how they interpreted the situation and it's their interpretation that's suspect not the fact that Suarez said the word negro. He has said from the start he used that word so no Liverpool fans are 'pretending it isn't in the report' when it quite clearly is and was admitted to before the report appeared!
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh you thought he looked guilty? I did not think. Case closed then!
.....................
Hoody, we know you do not think, you supply ample evidence of it every day.
Thats you owned , off you run now, soft lad.
Duncan Ferguson served prison time for an act of thuggery on the field, and displayed the same violence towards random individuals off the field. That makes his behaviour part of his nature.
---------------------------------------------------------
Fergusons "thuggery" was a head butt in a pre-season game, something that's been seen 1000's of times in the past. He got prosecuted, when he should have just received SFA sanctions, he left Scotland as a result & refused to play for the National side.
The off field issue, was him attacking 2 burglars in his own home, but don't let facts get in the way of your character assination of the man.
p.s. Suarez got banned for biting an opponent, not sure quite what that says about his "shy" nature,
Vidicschin (U3584)
As said you don't know the meaning of words. you can't just say someone is owned by writing something as spurious as that. You need facts like they are battering you with.
I don't have time for care in the community today VC you utterly weird man but while your arguing with the others without a leg to stand on why don't you tell them that the sky is green and the grass blue you deluded freak.
comment by johnsonsbaby (U10461)
posted 1 minute ago
Nobody's pretending anything VC - it's you who clearly hasn't read the report or you wouldn't need to ask if we were there when we spoke of Evra being allowed to watch video and Suarez not.
.....................
JB
Suarez admitted using the word negro, what has video evidence got to to with it?
He admitted his guilt, why do you keep ignoring this?
Toblerone Boots (U4965)
Loved that story about Dunc and the burglars! Quality.
As said you don't know the meaning of words.
................
Soft lad, neither do you, as has been shown already today.
Off you go.
Vidicschin (U3584)
*yawn*
Is that it. More spurious nonsense. Take a "vacation" laa.
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Vidicschin (U3584)
*yawn*
Is that it.
...............
Is what it?
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Point proven
.....................
You don't have a point, all you do is talk jibberish?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
You can round in circles forever on this one, but at the end of the day Terry was found innocent by a court of law and Suarez was sort of found guilty of probabilty by 3 blokes in a hotel, and putting my football preferences to one side, If Suarez had gone to a court of law I'm sure he would also been found innocent. Time to move on guys
Red's about nailed it there, aside from adding that Terry will get the same treatment from the FA as Suarez did, when they look at the case.
I wonder if Rio will make it to court for his tweet? They've thrown students in prison for it, will rio get the same treatment if found guilty?
VC - the video evidence has to do with the panel saying Evra's evidence was more consistent and that played a major part in them believing his version over Suarez. It was decided on probabilities and Evra being allowed to give evidence while watcvhing events would surely make his verson more correct than a mn going from memory.
For what it's worth I agree that since the FA say that it's forbidden to use any words relating to a persons colour on the field and words realting to colour are then used, they have to give a ban. It's the way they came to the conclusion and the amount of times a word was said that was totally wrong.
As for Duncan Ferguson - he has four convictions for assault. He punched a man on crutches in the face and head butted another man in a taxi queue, can't remember the other one but I'm certainly not talking about him attacking a burglar, he risked that the minute he broke in!
Reggie
Rio never tweeted it fella.
Sign in if you want to comment
Suarez Case vs Terry Case
Page 16 of 29
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
posted on 16/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/7/12
See VC is getting owned again. Sometimes it's like he does not understand the meaning on words!
posted on 16/7/12
Evra is a filthy liar. Disgusting. And the Mancs defend him. Even more disgusting.
posted on 16/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/7/12
VC - on the pitch Suarez has done some crazy things. Off the pitch he is a quiet individual. Terry on the other hand is bad on and off the pitch as are Barton, Balotelli, Rooney etc. etc. Duncan Ferguson served prison time for an act of thuggery on the field, and displayed the same violence towards random individuals off the field. That makes his behaviour part of his nature.
If Suarez acted 'despicably' off the pitch you may have a point, but he doesn't. Label him a crazy player or despicable player if that's the sort of language that comes easier to you but his behaviour has two very clearly defined differences.
posted on 16/7/12
See VC is getting owned again. Sometimes it's like he does not understand the meaning on words!
......................
Hoody,
I don't think you understand the meaning of the word 'owned'.
This is from the report. This is why Suarez was found gulity.
................
Mr Suarez said that he pinched Mr Evra's skin in an attempt to defuse the situation. He also said that his use of the word 'negro' to address Mr Evra was conciliatory and friendly. We rejected that evidence”
Independent Regulatory Commission report
...........................
You can bury this all you want, and you can keep pretending this is not in the report, but it is.
And it left Luis looking as gulity as a puppy sitting next to a pile of pooh.
posted on 16/7/12
Oh you thought he looked guilty? I did not think. Case closed then!
Not for one minute do I think you dress yourself in the morning.
posted on 16/7/12
VC - on the pitch Suarez has done some crazy things.
..................
Really. You think?
posted on 16/7/12
Nobody's pretending anything VC - it's you who clearly hasn't read the report or you wouldn't need to ask if we were there when we spoke of Evra being allowed to watch video and Suarez not.
The FA's decision is baed on how they interpreted the situation and it's their interpretation that's suspect not the fact that Suarez said the word negro. He has said from the start he used that word so no Liverpool fans are 'pretending it isn't in the report' when it quite clearly is and was admitted to before the report appeared!
posted on 16/7/12
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh you thought he looked guilty? I did not think. Case closed then!
.....................
Hoody, we know you do not think, you supply ample evidence of it every day.
Thats you owned , off you run now, soft lad.
posted on 16/7/12
Duncan Ferguson served prison time for an act of thuggery on the field, and displayed the same violence towards random individuals off the field. That makes his behaviour part of his nature.
---------------------------------------------------------
Fergusons "thuggery" was a head butt in a pre-season game, something that's been seen 1000's of times in the past. He got prosecuted, when he should have just received SFA sanctions, he left Scotland as a result & refused to play for the National side.
The off field issue, was him attacking 2 burglars in his own home, but don't let facts get in the way of your character assination of the man.
p.s. Suarez got banned for biting an opponent, not sure quite what that says about his "shy" nature,
posted on 16/7/12
Vidicschin (U3584)
As said you don't know the meaning of words. you can't just say someone is owned by writing something as spurious as that. You need facts like they are battering you with.
I don't have time for care in the community today VC you utterly weird man but while your arguing with the others without a leg to stand on why don't you tell them that the sky is green and the grass blue you deluded freak.
posted on 16/7/12
comment by johnsonsbaby (U10461)
posted 1 minute ago
Nobody's pretending anything VC - it's you who clearly hasn't read the report or you wouldn't need to ask if we were there when we spoke of Evra being allowed to watch video and Suarez not.
.....................
JB
Suarez admitted using the word negro, what has video evidence got to to with it?
He admitted his guilt, why do you keep ignoring this?
posted on 16/7/12
Toblerone Boots (U4965)
Loved that story about Dunc and the burglars! Quality.
posted on 16/7/12
As said you don't know the meaning of words.
................
Soft lad, neither do you, as has been shown already today.
Off you go.
posted on 16/7/12
Vidicschin (U3584)
*yawn*
Is that it. More spurious nonsense. Take a "vacation" laa.
posted on 16/7/12
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Vidicschin (U3584)
*yawn*
Is that it.
...............
Is what it?
posted on 16/7/12
Point proven.
posted on 16/7/12
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Point proven
.....................
You don't have a point, all you do is talk jibberish?
posted on 16/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/7/12
You can round in circles forever on this one, but at the end of the day Terry was found innocent by a court of law and Suarez was sort of found guilty of probabilty by 3 blokes in a hotel, and putting my football preferences to one side, If Suarez had gone to a court of law I'm sure he would also been found innocent. Time to move on guys
posted on 16/7/12
Red's about nailed it there, aside from adding that Terry will get the same treatment from the FA as Suarez did, when they look at the case.
posted on 16/7/12
I wonder if Rio will make it to court for his tweet? They've thrown students in prison for it, will rio get the same treatment if found guilty?
posted on 16/7/12
VC - the video evidence has to do with the panel saying Evra's evidence was more consistent and that played a major part in them believing his version over Suarez. It was decided on probabilities and Evra being allowed to give evidence while watcvhing events would surely make his verson more correct than a mn going from memory.
For what it's worth I agree that since the FA say that it's forbidden to use any words relating to a persons colour on the field and words realting to colour are then used, they have to give a ban. It's the way they came to the conclusion and the amount of times a word was said that was totally wrong.
As for Duncan Ferguson - he has four convictions for assault. He punched a man on crutches in the face and head butted another man in a taxi queue, can't remember the other one but I'm certainly not talking about him attacking a burglar, he risked that the minute he broke in!
posted on 16/7/12
Reggie
Rio never tweeted it fella.
Page 16 of 29
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21