or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 42 comments are related to an article called:

Parker or Sandro?

Page 1 of 2

posted on 13/7/12

As an "outsider", Sandro for me. Never understood the Parker hype.

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro easilly.

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro for me

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro is class

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro

posted on 13/7/12

both top class.

though, i heard Parker may need surgury on his Achillies and may be out for 1st couple of months of the season.

Sandro could be massive for us next season

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro is twice the player.

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro is more an avb player

comment by add912 (U9189)

posted on 13/7/12

Got to Judge it on form and rotate..

You people make me laugh, one moment Harry is rubbish for not rotating his squad then all of a sudden we are choosing a best 11 with our favourite CM's. I think that we should just concentrate on just getting inter-changeable combinations that can control midfield, no matter the personel... That may even mean playing both against some teams.

posted on 13/7/12

I cant see why we cant play sando and parker with a creative Modric/ Moutinio player.

Sando is more than a defensive midfielder. He has a great surge from midfield with power and pace. He has a fantastic all round game.

Against Swansea at home last season we played Sandro, Parker and Modric and it worked great. It also allowed Modric to get further more.

As add912 said it is a squad game and what we need is several options to counter the opposition and obviously any injuries we will get.

posted on 13/7/12

AVB favouts the Portguese speakiñg players......Parker back to West Ham iñ Jañuary wiñdow

posted on 13/7/12

Sorry Sandro not Sando. My keypad had a jonathan Ross moment. Problem with the R's

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro for me, but do not dismiss Parker, he has done a good job for Spurs and deserves some respect.

posted on 13/7/12

Both would be in mine, got to stop thinking of Sandro as just a DM he's much more

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 13/7/12

sandro.

its not even close

comment by adam85 (U9560)

posted on 13/7/12

messiavb - fully agree mate!

For me, Sandro is only thought of as a DM cause that's where Redknapp wanted him. Remember the screamer he scored (against Chelsea I think) and as he was celebrating, Redknapp was having a go at him for going too far forward.

I consider him more of a better version of Jenas. Can do the box to box role which would either use or negate Parker depending who we're up against.

posted on 13/7/12

Sandro every time.
'nuff said.

posted on 13/7/12

Sorry Sandro not Sando. My keypad had a jonathan Ross moment. Problem with the R's
.....................

comment by add912 (U9189)

posted on 13/7/12

They both do a good job for me, I like them. One is experienced and the other has potential. The thing about Tottenham's MF is that there is such quality there, we could really rotate and still beat teams comfortably.

Huddlestone is back now too. I hope we start to see him play again soon. Sandro, Parker and Livermore. Not to mention VDV and the replacement for Modric.

posted on 13/7/12

CM: Sandro - Huddlestone - Parker

posted on 13/7/12

posted on 14/7/12

Hmmm....Sandro, Parker, Moutinho, in front of them Bale, Lennon, Ade.....

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/7/12

drop parker and bring in huddlestone for his range of passing.

parker is combative but he cant pass wind

posted on 14/7/12

What about the 360s.. what about the 60s ??

Parker may well be getting on but we're going to need some experience out there - we need a captain on the field.. I think Parker should lead us out against Newcastle. I'm sure he's not going to mind giving way to Sandro sooner our later but who else are we going to give the armband to?

posted on 14/7/12

Sandro, Hes immense

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment