24 goals in 12 champions league matches on route to the final not bad for a team that apparently " defended their way to the final "
Man U only managed 19 goals in 12 champions league matches on route to the 08 final
just think,if you hadn't choked your 8 point lead,you could be playing at villa pk against chelsea
but you did and youre not
Bottlers
just think,if you hadn't choked your 8 point lead,you could be playing at villa pk against chelsea
but you did and youre not
Bottlers
------
This guy must only have been supporting man u since 09 seeing as they super defended their way to a penalty shootout final in 08 to win it by his logic they also only managed 1 goal vs Barca over 2 legs whereas the team that apparently " defended their way to the final 2 according to him managed 3
Do you even know how much we generate?
Do you know much we spend?
Also do you even know how FFP actually works?
how a club that generates very little compared to what it spends is able to spend a hundred million on new players when financial fair play is meant to kick in?
__________________________________________
The CL run, Super cup game, World club championship and subsequent revenue is estimated at £100 million.
Just spending what we earn. isnt that what the FFP rules are all about???????
grow up lads. It's not a United are better than you article, it's a genuine question about what is happening. City have spent nothing yet and appear to want to fall in line and create a sound business model then London Blue are chuckling money out all over the place.
As for last season, that's been and gone. I am only looking forward.
What an epic fail if you're gunna wum at least back it up with facts before hand otherwise you'll just be made to look like a clown like you have done This guy must be that daffy matt from not606
Carrickature. Do some research on us. How much we earn, how much we spend and how FFP actually works. Then come back and see if you have the same questions in mind for us.
they also only managed 1 goal vs Barca over 2 legs
===========================================
Well that doesnt really mean anything does it. They scored 7 at home to Roma, you scored 1 at home to Roma so not sure what you're getting at there.
Stop that mean Russian spending money
Well that doesnt really mean anything does it. They scored 7 at home to Roma, you scored 1 at home to Roma so not sure what you're getting at there.
------
Read the 2nd line of the article
If you're spending what you earn then that explains it. That was the answer I was looking for. Can't anyone ask a straight question anymore.
and surely any half decent London blue fan must appreciate how lucky you are to still be in the game so to speak. Lose that shoot out and it really was make or break. Fair play though, I reckon the league will be better having three strong teams this year. And you saved us from the nightmare that would have been hazard.
defended our way to victory in 08 we should have been 3-0 after 40 minutes in moscow and only a fluke goal by lampard got you back in it. i honestly dont begrudge you winning the ucl last season fair play,if you offered me losing like we did in 2011 or winning like you in 2012 id take winning everytime.
carrickature,
As I have said we are just spending what we are earning, and buying young talented players that will be around for many years thus making our ability to meet the FFP rules a lot easier in years to come.
PSG are doing something similar the 1st year they will fail miserably, but year 2 their costs will be a lot less. As long as a club is heading in the right direction as far as FFP rules are concerned the max penalty of explusion from european competions will not be used.
Carrickature, I could actually try to explain to the best of my understanding how we'll comply with FFP. Feels like you're on the WUM a bit though.
Well that doesnt really mean anything does it. They scored 7 at home to Roma, you scored 1 at home to Roma so not sure what you're getting at there.
------
Read the 2nd line of the article
-----
I did, but you (or someone else) was talking about goals scored? As it goes I was a huge Chelsea fan against Bayern and I am eternally grateful for your performance that night
carrickature
Oxford or Cambridge?
why should I research a club i don't support when i can get the answer from you lot.
it was a genuine question. thanks to those who answered it. grow up to the kids win think it's some pathetic wum.
its not necessarily the transfer fees its the long term affects of the huge wages being paid out what looks like a 35 million deal for hazard is probably more like a 100 million deal over 5 years, the deal to take ibra to psg is supposedly worth 15o million over the length of his contract
I did, but you (or someone else) was talking about goals scored? As it goes I was a huge Chelsea fan against Bayern and I am eternally grateful for your performance that night
------
Cheers . And the OP was wumming in the 2nd line moaning about how we defended our way to the champions league finals, so i was just merely stating a fact that on route to the cl final we managed 24 goals in 12 games whereas man u on route to the 08 final only managed 19 goals in 12 games.
Carrickature
Oxford or Cambridge?
I think you're also buying players Pep would like to manage. Interesting to see what happens there. Not much more Di Matteo can do.
As for the fair play. I genuinely didn't think you got that much for winning the cup.
This muppet tried getting me banned. His plan failed though
Your whole first paragraph is a WUM
Your second paragraph is just stupidity from you
Sign in if you want to comment
Fair Play Chelsea
Page 1 of 4
posted on 19/7/12
24 goals in 12 champions league matches on route to the final not bad for a team that apparently " defended their way to the final "
Man U only managed 19 goals in 12 champions league matches on route to the 08 final
posted on 19/7/12
just think,if you hadn't choked your 8 point lead,you could be playing at villa pk against chelsea
but you did and youre not
Bottlers
posted on 19/7/12
just think,if you hadn't choked your 8 point lead,you could be playing at villa pk against chelsea
but you did and youre not
Bottlers
------
This guy must only have been supporting man u since 09 seeing as they super defended their way to a penalty shootout final in 08 to win it by his logic they also only managed 1 goal vs Barca over 2 legs whereas the team that apparently " defended their way to the final 2 according to him managed 3
posted on 19/7/12
Do you even know how much we generate?
Do you know much we spend?
Also do you even know how FFP actually works?
posted on 19/7/12
how a club that generates very little compared to what it spends is able to spend a hundred million on new players when financial fair play is meant to kick in?
__________________________________________
The CL run, Super cup game, World club championship and subsequent revenue is estimated at £100 million.
Just spending what we earn. isnt that what the FFP rules are all about???????
posted on 19/7/12
grow up lads. It's not a United are better than you article, it's a genuine question about what is happening. City have spent nothing yet and appear to want to fall in line and create a sound business model then London Blue are chuckling money out all over the place.
As for last season, that's been and gone. I am only looking forward.
posted on 19/7/12
What an epic fail if you're gunna wum at least back it up with facts before hand otherwise you'll just be made to look like a clown like you have done This guy must be that daffy matt from not606
posted on 19/7/12
Carrickature. Do some research on us. How much we earn, how much we spend and how FFP actually works. Then come back and see if you have the same questions in mind for us.
posted on 19/7/12
they also only managed 1 goal vs Barca over 2 legs
===========================================
Well that doesnt really mean anything does it. They scored 7 at home to Roma, you scored 1 at home to Roma so not sure what you're getting at there.
posted on 19/7/12
Stop that mean Russian spending money
posted on 19/7/12
Well that doesnt really mean anything does it. They scored 7 at home to Roma, you scored 1 at home to Roma so not sure what you're getting at there.
------
Read the 2nd line of the article
posted on 19/7/12
If you're spending what you earn then that explains it. That was the answer I was looking for. Can't anyone ask a straight question anymore.
and surely any half decent London blue fan must appreciate how lucky you are to still be in the game so to speak. Lose that shoot out and it really was make or break. Fair play though, I reckon the league will be better having three strong teams this year. And you saved us from the nightmare that would have been hazard.
posted on 19/7/12
defended our way to victory in 08 we should have been 3-0 after 40 minutes in moscow and only a fluke goal by lampard got you back in it. i honestly dont begrudge you winning the ucl last season fair play,if you offered me losing like we did in 2011 or winning like you in 2012 id take winning everytime.
posted on 19/7/12
carrickature,
As I have said we are just spending what we are earning, and buying young talented players that will be around for many years thus making our ability to meet the FFP rules a lot easier in years to come.
PSG are doing something similar the 1st year they will fail miserably, but year 2 their costs will be a lot less. As long as a club is heading in the right direction as far as FFP rules are concerned the max penalty of explusion from european competions will not be used.
posted on 19/7/12
Carrickature, I could actually try to explain to the best of my understanding how we'll comply with FFP. Feels like you're on the WUM a bit though.
posted on 19/7/12
Well that doesnt really mean anything does it. They scored 7 at home to Roma, you scored 1 at home to Roma so not sure what you're getting at there.
------
Read the 2nd line of the article
-----
I did, but you (or someone else) was talking about goals scored? As it goes I was a huge Chelsea fan against Bayern and I am eternally grateful for your performance that night
posted on 19/7/12
carrickature
Oxford or Cambridge?
posted on 19/7/12
why should I research a club i don't support when i can get the answer from you lot.
it was a genuine question. thanks to those who answered it. grow up to the kids win think it's some pathetic wum.
posted on 19/7/12
posted on 19/7/12
its not necessarily the transfer fees its the long term affects of the huge wages being paid out what looks like a 35 million deal for hazard is probably more like a 100 million deal over 5 years, the deal to take ibra to psg is supposedly worth 15o million over the length of his contract
posted on 19/7/12
posted on 19/7/12
I did, but you (or someone else) was talking about goals scored? As it goes I was a huge Chelsea fan against Bayern and I am eternally grateful for your performance that night
------
Cheers . And the OP was wumming in the 2nd line moaning about how we defended our way to the champions league finals, so i was just merely stating a fact that on route to the cl final we managed 24 goals in 12 games whereas man u on route to the 08 final only managed 19 goals in 12 games.
posted on 19/7/12
Carrickature
Oxford or Cambridge?
posted on 19/7/12
I think you're also buying players Pep would like to manage. Interesting to see what happens there. Not much more Di Matteo can do.
As for the fair play. I genuinely didn't think you got that much for winning the cup.
posted on 19/7/12
This muppet tried getting me banned. His plan failed though
Your whole first paragraph is a WUM
Your second paragraph is just stupidity from you
Page 1 of 4